chr5-1294051-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_198253.3(TERT):c.835G>A(p.Ala279Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0271 in 1,592,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 703 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198253.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERT | NM_198253.3 | c.835G>A | p.Ala279Thr | missense_variant | 2/16 | ENST00000310581.10 | NP_937983.2 | |
TERT | NM_001193376.3 | c.835G>A | p.Ala279Thr | missense_variant | 2/15 | NP_001180305.1 | ||
TERT | NR_149162.3 | n.914G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 | ||||
TERT | NR_149163.3 | n.914G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERT | ENST00000310581.10 | c.835G>A | p.Ala279Thr | missense_variant | 2/16 | 1 | NM_198253.3 | ENSP00000309572.5 | ||
TERT | ENST00000334602.10 | c.835G>A | p.Ala279Thr | missense_variant | 2/15 | 1 | ENSP00000334346.6 | |||
TERT | ENST00000460137.6 | n.835G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 | 1 | ENSP00000425003.1 | ||||
TERT | ENST00000656021.1 | n.835G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/17 | ENSP00000499759.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0220 AC: 3341AN: 152174Hom.: 57 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0225 AC: 4706AN: 209266Hom.: 83 AF XY: 0.0229 AC XY: 2618AN XY: 114518
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0277 AC: 39834AN: 1439848Hom.: 647 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0273 AC XY: 19495AN XY: 715172
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0219 AC: 3339AN: 152292Hom.: 56 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0226 AC XY: 1681AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | Ala279Thr in exon 2 of TERT: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it has been identified in 3.0% (255/8580) of European American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61748181). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 01, 2023 | - - |
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital | May 04, 2023 | European Non-Finnish population allele frequency is 2.81% (rs61748181, 1118/18984 alleles, 30 homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1). Based on the classification scheme RMH Modified ACMG/AMP Guidelines v1.5.1, this variant is classified as BENIGN. Following criteria are met: BA1 - |
Aplastic anemia Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care | - | - - |
Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at