chr5-132392606-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 4P and 9B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):c.1441G>A(p.Val481Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00104 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V481F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003060.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC22A5 | NM_003060.4 | c.1441G>A | p.Val481Ile | missense_variant | 8/10 | ENST00000245407.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC22A5 | ENST00000245407.8 | c.1441G>A | p.Val481Ile | missense_variant | 8/10 | 1 | NM_003060.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000736 AC: 112AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000708 AC: 178AN: 251254Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000773 AC XY: 105AN XY: 135824
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00107 AC: 1564AN: 1461672Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00105 AC XY: 764AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000736 AC: 112AN: 152260Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000698 AC XY: 52AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Renal carnitine transport defect Uncertain:3Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | May 27, 2021 | ACMG classification criteria: BP4 supporting - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 13, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | in vitro;research | Giacomini Lab, University of California, San Francisco | Oct 03, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 10, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 07, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16931768, 29406958) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2017 | - - |
SLC22A5-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 14, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at