chr5-148131303-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006846.4(SPINK5):​c.3009T>C​(p.Gly1003Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.604 in 1,613,442 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 298,343 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.56 ( 24691 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.61 ( 273652 hom. )

Consequence

SPINK5
NM_006846.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.314

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPINK5 (HGNC:15464): (serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 5) This gene encodes a multidomain serine protease inhibitor that contains 15 potential inhibitory domains. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products, which may exhibit unique activities and specificities. These proteins may play a role in skin and hair morphogenesis, as well as anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial protection of mucous epithelia. Mutations in this gene may result in Netherton syndrome, a disorder characterized by ichthyosis, defective cornification, and atopy. This gene is present in a gene cluster on chromosome 5. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
FBXO38-DT (HGNC:55589): (FBXO38 divergent transcript)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 5-148131303-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-148131303-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260055.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.314 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.638 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006846.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SPINK5
NM_006846.4
MANE Select
c.3009T>Cp.Gly1003Gly
synonymous
Exon 31 of 33NP_006837.2
SPINK5
NM_001127698.2
c.3099T>Cp.Gly1033Gly
synonymous
Exon 32 of 34NP_001121170.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SPINK5
ENST00000256084.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.3009T>Cp.Gly1003Gly
synonymous
Exon 31 of 33ENSP00000256084.7
SPINK5
ENST00000359874.7
TSL:1
c.3099T>Cp.Gly1033Gly
synonymous
Exon 32 of 34ENSP00000352936.3
FBXO38-DT
ENST00000667608.1
n.1257-37561A>G
intron
N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.562
AC:
85275
AN:
151868
Hom.:
24656
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.419
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.592
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.649
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.540
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.471
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.504
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.632
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.538
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.629
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.559
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.599
AC:
149391
AN:
249530
AF XY:
0.593
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.418
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.746
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.550
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.462
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.642
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.622
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.598
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.608
AC:
889275
AN:
1461456
Hom.:
273652
Cov.:
51
AF XY:
0.605
AC XY:
440042
AN XY:
727052
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.414
AC:
13873
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.732
AC:
32719
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.550
AC:
14369
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.437
AC:
17339
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.508
AC:
43782
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.642
AC:
34263
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.536
AC:
3092
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.624
AC:
694182
AN:
1111674
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.591
AC:
35656
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20111
40222
60332
80443
100554
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18454
36908
55362
73816
92270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.562
AC:
85359
AN:
151986
Hom.:
24691
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.561
AC XY:
41694
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.420
AC:
17390
AN:
41416
American (AMR)
AF:
0.649
AC:
9909
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.540
AC:
1874
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.470
AC:
2424
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.505
AC:
2437
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.632
AC:
6672
AN:
10560
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.520
AC:
153
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.629
AC:
42779
AN:
67976
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.560
AC:
1181
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1862
3723
5585
7446
9308
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
734
1468
2202
2936
3670
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.601
Hom.:
83704
Bravo
AF:
0.558
Asia WGS
AF:
0.536
AC:
1858
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.617
EpiControl
AF:
0.616

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency

Jan 24, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 91% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 80. Only high quality variants are reported.

not provided Benign:1Other:1
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing.

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ichthyosis linearis circumflexa Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Netherton syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
CADD
Benign
8.2
DANN
Benign
0.70
PhyloP100
0.31
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2400478; hg19: chr5-147510866; COSMIC: COSV56249075; API