chr5-6604163-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_017755.6(NSUN2):c.1932G>T(p.Glu644Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000378 in 1,613,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017755.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSUN2 | NM_017755.6 | c.1932G>T | p.Glu644Asp | missense_variant | 17/19 | ENST00000264670.11 | NP_060225.4 | |
NSUN2 | NM_001193455.2 | c.1827G>T | p.Glu609Asp | missense_variant | 16/18 | NP_001180384.1 | ||
NSUN2 | NR_037947.2 | n.1912G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 16/18 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSUN2 | ENST00000264670.11 | c.1932G>T | p.Glu644Asp | missense_variant | 17/19 | 1 | NM_017755.6 | ENSP00000264670.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251232Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135816
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000404 AC: 59AN: 1461678Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000358 AC XY: 26AN XY: 727140
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74358
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 20, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at