chr5-90704402-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):c.8300C>T(p.Thr2767Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000704 in 1,420,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032119.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.8300C>T | p.Thr2767Ile | missense_variant | 36/90 | ENST00000405460.9 | NP_115495.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.8300C>T | p.Thr2767Ile | missense_variant | 36/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | ENSP00000384582.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.04e-7 AC: 1AN: 1420320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000142 AC XY: 1AN XY: 702502
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 25, 2017 | p.Thr2767Ile in exon 36 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note, 4 mammals (sheep, domestic goat, bat and big brown bat) have an isoleucin e (Ile) at this position despite high nearby amino acid conservation. In additio n, computational prediction tools do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at