chr7-107915598-A-G

Variant names:

• chr7-107915598-A-G
• rs1065762
• NM_000108.5:c.777A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_000108.5(DLD):​c.777A>G​(p.Lys259Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00156 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 38 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0087 (19 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 (19 hom.)
• Consequence: DLD NM_000108.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 2.08

Genes affected

DLD (HGNC:2898): (dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase) This gene encodes a member of the class-I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. In homodimeric form, the encoded protein functions as a dehydrogenase and is found in several multi-enzyme complexes that regulate energy metabolism. However, as a monomer, this protein can function as a protease. Mutations in this gene have been identified in patients with E3-deficient maple syrup urine disease and lipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
• BP6: Variant 7-107915598-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107915598-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137098.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.08 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00874 (1331/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0303 (1260/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0289. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 590 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DLD	NM_000108.5	c.777A>G	p.Lys259Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 14	ENST00000205402.10	NP_000099.2
DLD	NM_001289751.1	c.708A>G	p.Lys236Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 13		NP_001276680.1
DLD	NM_001289752.1	c.633A>G	p.Lys211Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 13		NP_001276681.1
DLD	NM_001289750.1	c.480A>G	p.Lys160Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 12		NP_001276679.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DLD	ENST00000205402.10	c.777A>G	p.Lys259Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 14	1	NM_000108.5	ENSP00000205402.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00873 AC: 1329 AN: 152176 Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0304

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00340

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00670

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00219 AC: 550 AN: 251248 Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00153 AC XY: 208 AN XY: 135800

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0297

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00136

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000114

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00114

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000810 AC: 1184 AN: 1461578 Hom.: 19 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000670 AC XY: 487 AN XY: 727102

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0295

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00143

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000324

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00144

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00874 AC: 1331 AN: 152294 Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00792 AC XY: 590 AN XY: 74464

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0303

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00340

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00663

Alfa AF: 0.00407 Hom.: 6

Bravo AF: 0.00946

Asia WGS AF: 0.00202 AC: 7 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000218

EpiControl AF: 0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency Benign:3

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 16, 2016

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1

Jul 27, 2011

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Leigh syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.53
CADD	Benign	9.5
DANN	Benign	0.65
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.030		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1065762; hg19: chr7-107556043;