rs1065762

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000108.5(DLD):​c.777A>G​(p.Lys259Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00156 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 38 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0087 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

DLD
NM_000108.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.08

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DLD (HGNC:2898): (dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase) This gene encodes a member of the class-I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. In homodimeric form, the encoded protein functions as a dehydrogenase and is found in several multi-enzyme complexes that regulate energy metabolism. However, as a monomer, this protein can function as a protease. Mutations in this gene have been identified in patients with E3-deficient maple syrup urine disease and lipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
DLD Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 7-107915598-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107915598-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137098.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.08 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00874 (1331/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0303 (1260/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0289. There are 19 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 590 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DLDNM_000108.5 linkc.777A>G p.Lys259Lys synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 14 ENST00000205402.10 NP_000099.2 P09622-1A0A024R713
DLDNM_001289751.1 linkc.708A>G p.Lys236Lys synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 13 NP_001276680.1 P09622E9PEX6
DLDNM_001289752.1 linkc.633A>G p.Lys211Lys synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 13 NP_001276681.1 P09622-3
DLDNM_001289750.1 linkc.480A>G p.Lys160Lys synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 12 NP_001276679.1 P09622-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DLDENST00000205402.10 linkc.777A>G p.Lys259Lys synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 14 1 NM_000108.5 ENSP00000205402.3 P09622-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00873
AC:
1329
AN:
152176
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0304
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00670
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00219
AC:
550
AN:
251248
AF XY:
0.00153
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0297
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000810
AC:
1184
AN:
1461578
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000670
AC XY:
487
AN XY:
727102
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0295
AC:
986
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
64
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39636
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
4
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00121
AC:
7
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000324
AC:
36
AN:
1111862
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
87
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
123
184
246
307
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00874
AC:
1331
AN:
152294
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00792
AC XY:
590
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0303
AC:
1260
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
52
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00663
AC:
14
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
68
136
204
272
340
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00412
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00946
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency Benign:3
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 16, 2016
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jul 27, 2011
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
9.5
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
2.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=91/9
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1065762; hg19: chr7-107556043; API