chr7-150951584-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):c.1809C>T(p.Gly603=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00233 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 41 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 34 hom. )
Consequence
KCNH2
NM_000238.4 synonymous
NM_000238.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.73
Genes affected
KCNH2 (HGNC:6251): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2) This gene encodes a component of a voltage-activated potassium channel found in cardiac muscle, nerve cells, and microglia. Four copies of this protein interact with one copy of the KCNE2 protein to form a functional potassium channel. Mutations in this gene can cause long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2). Transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 7-150951584-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-150951584-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 220202.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-150951584-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.73 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0128 (1947/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0441 (1833/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0424. There are 41 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 928 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1947 AD,Digenic gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNH2 | NM_000238.4 | c.1809C>T | p.Gly603= | synonymous_variant | 7/15 | ENST00000262186.10 | NP_000229.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNH2 | ENST00000262186.10 | c.1809C>T | p.Gly603= | synonymous_variant | 7/15 | 1 | NM_000238.4 | ENSP00000262186 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0128 AC: 1944AN: 152194Hom.: 41 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1944
AN:
152194
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00331 AC: 833AN: 251424Hom.: 20 AF XY: 0.00235 AC XY: 319AN XY: 135906
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
833
AN:
251424
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
319
AN XY:
135906
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00124 AC: 1809AN: 1461862Hom.: 34 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 788AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1809
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
788
AN XY:
727236
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0128 AC: 1947AN: 152312Hom.: 41 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0125 AC XY: 928AN XY: 74474
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1947
AN:
152312
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
928
AN XY:
74474
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 11, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 06, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Long QT syndrome 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 16, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at