rs41314375

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):​c.1809C>T​(p.Gly603Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00233 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 41 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 34 hom. )

Consequence

KCNH2
NM_000238.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.73

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNH2 (HGNC:6251): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2) This gene encodes a component of a voltage-activated potassium channel found in cardiac muscle, nerve cells, and microglia. Four copies of this protein interact with one copy of the KCNE2 protein to form a functional potassium channel. Mutations in this gene can cause long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2). Transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
KCNH2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • long QT syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • short QT syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • Brugada syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 7-150951584-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-150951584-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 220202.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.73 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0128 (1947/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0441 (1833/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0424. There are 41 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 928 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1947 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KCNH2NM_000238.4 linkc.1809C>T p.Gly603Gly synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 15 ENST00000262186.10 NP_000229.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KCNH2ENST00000262186.10 linkc.1809C>T p.Gly603Gly synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 15 1 NM_000238.4 ENSP00000262186.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0128
AC:
1944
AN:
152194
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0442
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00765
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00331
AC:
833
AN:
251424
AF XY:
0.00235
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0447
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00211
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000149
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00124
AC:
1809
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00108
AC XY:
788
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0422
AC:
1413
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00246
AC:
110
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000696
AC:
6
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53390
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00156
AC:
9
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000112
AC:
124
AN:
1112012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
147
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
132
264
396
528
660
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0128
AC:
1947
AN:
152312
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0125
AC XY:
928
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0441
AC:
1833
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00483
AC:
74
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000194
AC:
1
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000309
AC:
21
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00757
AC:
16
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
91
182
272
363
454
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0125
Hom.:
21
Bravo
AF:
0.0140
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 06, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jun 26, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 16, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
-3.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41314375; hg19: chr7-150648672; COSMIC: COSV100060321; API