chr7-21744562-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):āc.8279A>Gā(p.Gln2760Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000173 in 1,613,618 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0010 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.000086 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DNAH11
NM_001277115.2 missense
NM_001277115.2 missense
Scores
2
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.78
Genes affected
DNAH11 (HGNC:2942): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 11) This gene encodes a ciliary outer dynein arm protein and is a member of the dynein heavy chain family. It is a microtubule-dependent motor ATPase and has been reported to be involved in the movement of respiratory cilia. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in causing Kartagener Syndrome (a combination of situs inversus totalis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), also called Immotile Cilia Syndrome 1 (ICS1)) and male sterility. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009405345).
BP6
Variant 7-21744562-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-21744562-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 445678.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00101 (154/152358) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00358 (149/41588). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00311. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 81 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH11 | NM_001277115.2 | c.8279A>G | p.Gln2760Arg | missense_variant | 50/82 | ENST00000409508.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH11 | ENST00000409508.8 | c.8279A>G | p.Gln2760Arg | missense_variant | 50/82 | 5 | NM_001277115.2 | P1 | |
DNAH11 | ENST00000605912.1 | c.475-308A>G | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00101 AC: 154AN: 152240Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
154
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000294 AC: 73AN: 248510Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000245 AC XY: 33AN XY: 134754
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
73
AN:
248510
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
134754
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000855 AC: 125AN: 1461260Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000812 AC XY: 59AN XY: 726838
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
1461260
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
726838
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00101 AC: 154AN: 152358Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 81AN XY: 74508
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
154
AN:
152358
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
81
AN XY:
74508
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
14
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
46
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Apr 28, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 18, 2021 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 10, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
.;T;.
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at