chr7-30594853-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001316772.1(GARS1):c.-231T>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,352,650 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001316772.1 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARS1 | ENST00000675810 | c.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502743.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674815 | c.-247T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 17 | ENSP00000502799.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000675051.1 | c.22-3943T>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502296.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674643.1 | n.-69T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 17 | ENSP00000501636.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674807.1 | n.-69T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502814.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000675529.1 | n.-69T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 18 | ENSP00000501655.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676088.1 | n.-69T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 19 | ENSP00000501884.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676210.1 | n.-69T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 18 | ENSP00000502373.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676403.1 | n.-69T>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502681.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674643.1 | n.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 17 | ENSP00000501636.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674807.1 | n.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502814.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000675529.1 | n.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 18 | ENSP00000501655.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676088.1 | n.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 19 | ENSP00000501884.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676210.1 | n.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 18 | ENSP00000502373.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676403.1 | n.-69T>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 16 | ENSP00000502681.1 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000389266.8 | c.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | 1 | NM_002047.4 | ENSP00000373918.3 | ||||
GARS1 | ENST00000675651.1 | c.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502513.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000675693.1 | c.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502174.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674851.1 | c.-283T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502451.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000444666.6 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | 3 | ENSP00000415447.2 | |||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674616.1 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502408.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000674737.1 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502464.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000675859.1 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502033.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676140.1 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000502571.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676164.1 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000501986.1 | ||||||
GARS1 | ENST00000676259.1 | n.-69T>A | upstream_gene_variant | ENSP00000501980.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00133 AC: 203AN: 152172Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00135 AC: 1626AN: 1200360Hom.: 24 Cov.: 17 AF XY: 0.00131 AC XY: 784AN XY: 600336
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00133 AC: 203AN: 152290Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 111AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at