chr9-127826645-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000373203.9(ENG):c.388C>T(p.Pro130Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000413 in 1,613,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P130L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000373203.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENG | NM_001114753.3 | c.388C>T | p.Pro130Ser | missense_variant | 4/15 | ENST00000373203.9 | NP_001108225.1 | |
ENG | NM_000118.4 | c.388C>T | p.Pro130Ser | missense_variant | 4/14 | NP_000109.1 | ||
ENG | NM_001406715.1 | c.388C>T | p.Pro130Ser | missense_variant | 4/8 | NP_001393644.1 | ||
ENG | NM_001278138.2 | c.-159C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 4/15 | NP_001265067.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENG | ENST00000373203.9 | c.388C>T | p.Pro130Ser | missense_variant | 4/15 | 1 | NM_001114753.3 | ENSP00000362299 | P2 | |
ENG | ENST00000344849.4 | c.388C>T | p.Pro130Ser | missense_variant | 4/14 | 1 | ENSP00000341917 | A2 | ||
ENG | ENST00000480266.6 | c.-159C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 4/15 | 2 | ENSP00000479015 | ||||
ENG | ENST00000462196.1 | n.288C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000546 AC: 137AN: 251040Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000729 AC XY: 99AN XY: 135712
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000428 AC: 626AN: 1461688Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000550 AC XY: 400AN XY: 727146
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000263 AC: 40AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge | Jan 01, 2018 | BS1 +BP2 - |
ENG-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 03, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | ENG: BP4, BS1 - |
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 16, 2021 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at