chrX-136648355-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000074.3(CD40LG):c.107T>G(p.Met36Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M36K) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000074.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hyper-IgM syndrome type 1Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000074.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD40LG | NM_000074.3 | MANE Select | c.107T>G | p.Met36Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | NP_000065.1 | P29965 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD40LG | ENST00000370629.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.107T>G | p.Met36Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000359663.2 | P29965 | |
| CD40LG | ENST00000370628.2 | TSL:1 | c.107T>G | p.Met36Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000359662.2 | Q3L8U2 | |
| CD40LG | ENST00000695724.1 | c.107T>G | p.Met36Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000512122.1 | A0A8Q3WKP2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 22
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 22
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at