Menu
GeneBe

rs1042396

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.1581G>A(p.Arg527=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.257 in 1,613,658 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 56,191 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.20 ( 3863 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.26 ( 52328 hom. )

Consequence

GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.480
Variant links:
Genes affected
GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 17-80110970-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80110970-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92466.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-80110970-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.48 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.275 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GAANM_000152.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1581G>A p.Arg527= synonymous_variant 11/20 ENST00000302262.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GAAENST00000302262.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1581G>A p.Arg527= synonymous_variant 11/201 NM_000152.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.204
AC:
30958
AN:
151984
Hom.:
3865
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0633
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.214
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.254
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.117
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.212
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.243
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.266
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.278
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.223
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.232
AC:
58151
AN:
251098
Hom.:
7342
AF XY:
0.237
AC XY:
32181
AN XY:
135800
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0585
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.252
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.119
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.235
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.276
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.249
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.263
AC:
384357
AN:
1461556
Hom.:
52328
Cov.:
48
AF XY:
0.262
AC XY:
190598
AN XY:
727070
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0608
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.232
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.254
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.120
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.232
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.281
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.250
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.203
AC:
30948
AN:
152102
Hom.:
3863
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.202
AC XY:
14983
AN XY:
74340
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0632
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.254
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.117
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.211
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.243
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.278
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.221
Alfa
AF:
0.250
Hom.:
2622
Bravo
AF:
0.199
Asia WGS
AF:
0.152
AC:
528
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.286
EpiControl
AF:
0.286

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 20, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPhosphorus, Inc.Aug 01, 2017- -
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 04, 2018- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 19, 2015- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 11, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
Cadd
Benign
7.0
Dann
Benign
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1042396; hg19: chr17-78084769; COSMIC: COSV56407599; COSMIC: COSV56407599; API