Menu
GeneBe

rs104895032

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_002485.5(NBN):c.1262T>C(p.Leu421Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 1,613,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L421L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NBN
NM_002485.5 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:15O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00200
Variant links:
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0078063905).
BP6
Variant 8-89955418-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89955418-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127009.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=7, not_provided=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr8-89955418-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NBNNM_002485.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1262T>C p.Leu421Ser missense_variant 10/16 ENST00000265433.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NBNENST00000265433.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1262T>C p.Leu421Ser missense_variant 10/161 NM_002485.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152124
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000368
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000370
AC:
93
AN:
251376
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000397
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
135856
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000343
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000315
AC:
460
AN:
1461652
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000308
AC XY:
224
AN XY:
727128
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000279
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000414
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000263
AC:
40
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000282
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000368
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000447
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000261
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000371
AC:
45
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:15Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:5Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 08, 2017- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyHarris Lab, University of Minnesota-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 12, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 23, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25980754, 26315354, 23555315, 20805886, 28135145, 28873162, 28726808, 30374176, 31278556) -
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Uncertain:3Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 03, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Nov 11, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 13, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 21, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneID Lab - Advanced Molecular DiagnosticsSep 07, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsSep 28, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Jan 10, 2023- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 15, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 28, 2021Variant summary: NBN c.1262T>C (p.Leu421Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00037 in 260122 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The variant was also reported in 7 European American women older than age 70 years who have never had cancer. This data provide supporting evidence for a benign role. c.1262T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CVID, OvC, HBOC, Lynch syndrome and PDAC (e.g. Offer_2010, Ramus_2015, Tung_2015, Yurgelun_2015, 2017, Chaffee_2018, Dorling_2021) but it was also reported in multiple controls (Offer_2010, Ramus_2015, Dorling_2021). Additionally, evidence of non co-segregation with disease was provided through the study of a large family affected with different types of cancer including breast cancer (Tsai_2019), providing further supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four Five ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign and eight ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite it as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Aplastic anemia;C0023449:Acute lymphoid leukemia;C0398791:Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The NBN p.Leu421Ser variant was identified in 5 of 11992 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from individuals or families with antibody deficiency syndromes IgAD or CVID, ovarian cancer or Lynch syndrome and was present in 3 of 8746 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from healthy individuals (Offer 2010, Ramus 2015, Yurgelun 2015, Yurgelun 2017). The variant was also found in Genome-Wide testing of putative functional exonic variants with relative risk 1.224 and P=0.87 (Haiman 2013). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs104895032) as "With other allele", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae; as uncertain significance by eight submitters). The variant was not identified in LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in control databases in 105 of 277090 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 6 of 24016 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Other in 3 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Latino in 1 of 34408 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European in 44 of 126620 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Ashkenazi Jewish in 43 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Finnish in 8 of 25790 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while the variant was not observed in the East Asian, and South Asian populations. The p.Leu421 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMay 29, 2018The NBN variant designated as NM_002485.4: c.1262T>C (p.Leu421Ser) is classified as likely benign. Cosegregation analysis of one observed family was performed using analyze.myvariant.org (Rañola et al, 2018, PMID:28965303) and yields a likelihood ratio of 1.88 to 1 that the allele is causing cancer in the family (Thompson et al, 2003, PMID:2900794, Damiola et al, 2014, PMID:24894818). However, this variant is found in approximately 1 out of 120 individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry (exac.broadinstitute.org), which is a higher frequency than expected of a pathogenic NBN variant (Kobayashi et al, 2017, PMID:28166811). It is listed in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 127009) and has been classified as benign by another clinical laboratory. Computer software programs also predict that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID: 29300386) gives about 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to alter NBN function or modify cancer risk. A modest (less than 2-fold) increase in cancer risk due to this variant cannot be excluded. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
Cadd
Benign
5.2
Dann
Benign
0.60
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.93
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.031
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.56
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.017
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0078
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.79
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.040
Sift
Uncertain
0.021
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.096
T;D
Polyphen
0.38
B;.
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.44
MPC
0.098
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
-0.99
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.033
gMVP
0.17

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs104895032; hg19: chr8-90967646; API