rs1052161
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):c.12089G>A(p.Arg4030Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.626 in 1,613,740 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 320,677 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001378454.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | NM_001378454.1 | c.12089G>A | p.Arg4030Lys | missense_variant | 19/23 | ENST00000613296.6 | |
ALMS1 | NM_015120.4 | c.12092G>A | p.Arg4031Lys | missense_variant | 19/23 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMS1 | ENST00000613296.6 | c.12089G>A | p.Arg4030Lys | missense_variant | 19/23 | 1 | NM_001378454.1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.556 AC: 84422AN: 151928Hom.: 25095 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.641 AC: 159886AN: 249530Hom.: 52455 AF XY: 0.643 AC XY: 86987AN XY: 135192
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.633 AC: 924990AN: 1461694Hom.: 295584 Cov.: 68 AF XY: 0.634 AC XY: 460907AN XY: 727130
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.555 AC: 84438AN: 152046Hom.: 25093 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.562 AC XY: 41740AN XY: 74304
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 09, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 21, 2016 | p.Arg4029Lys in exon 19 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 75.39% (6458/8566) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitut e.org; dbSNP rs1052161). - |
Alstrom syndrome Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at