rs1055355510
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_003041.4(SLC5A2):c.890T>C(p.Ile297Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000031 in 1,613,368 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I297F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003041.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial renal glucosuriaInheritance: AD, SD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003041.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC5A2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.890T>C | p.Ile297Thr | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000327943.3 | P31639-1 | ||
| SLC5A2 | TSL:1 | n.890T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 8 of 12 | ENSP00000410601.2 | P31639-2 | |||
| SLC5A2 | c.878T>C | p.Ile293Thr | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000535439.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726944 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74334 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at