rs1057516953
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_Moderate
The NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.281C>G(p.Thr94Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T94I) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000441.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Pendred syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- athyreosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- thyroid hypoplasiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC26A4 | NM_000441.2 | c.281C>G | p.Thr94Ser | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 21 | ENST00000644269.2 | NP_000432.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74326 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at