Menu
GeneBe

rs1060503407

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.1059A>G(p.Gln353=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.55
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 10-86919362-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86919362-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 411640.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.55 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BMPR1ANM_004329.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1059A>G p.Gln353= synonymous_variant 10/13 ENST00000372037.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BMPR1AENST00000372037.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1059A>G p.Gln353= synonymous_variant 10/131 NM_004329.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000797
AC:
2
AN:
250796
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000737
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135696
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
6.85e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1460912
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
726780
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 19, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 21, 2019Variant summary: BMPR1A c.1059A>G alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. Several computational tools via ALAMUT predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Two predict the variant creates a cryptic exonic 3' acceptor site. Two predict the variant to have no significant impact on splicing. Another in-silico tool for assessing the pathogenicity of synonymous variants, namely TraP (Transcript-inferred Pathogenicity, Gelfman_2017) predicts this variant to be possibly pathogenic. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 250796 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1059A>G in individuals affected with Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (three as likely benign and one as uncertain significance). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 19, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 27, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 02, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 11, 2023- -
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 08, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Benign
6.4
Dann
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1060503407; hg19: chr10-88679119; API