rs1064793470
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.1291A>G(p.Arg431Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,612,532 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (โ โ ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R431M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1291A>G | p.Arg431Gly | missense_variant | 12/15 | ENST00000404276.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1291A>G | p.Arg431Gly | missense_variant | 12/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460296Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726594
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 18, 2018 | This variant is denoted CHEK2 c.1291A>G at the cDNA level, p.Arg431Gly (R431G) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Glycine (AGG>GGG). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. CHEK2 Arg431Gly was not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). This variant is located within the protein kinase domain (Cai 2009, Roeb 2012) In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether CHEK2 Arg431Gly is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | May 08, 2023 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variantยฌโ is likely to be tolerated. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 418842). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CHEK2-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 431 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Arg431Gly). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 20, 2023 | The p.R431G variant (also known as c.1291A>G), located in coding exon 11 of the CHEK2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1291. The arginine at codon 431 is replaced by glycine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at