Menu
GeneBe

rs111033188

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 2P and 12B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.368C>A(p.Thr123Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000193 in 1,613,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
NM_004004.6 missense

Scores

1
2
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 6 uncertain in NM_004004.6
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013856769).
BP6
Variant 13-20189214-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20189214-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44743.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GJB2NM_004004.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.368C>A p.Thr123Asn missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000382848.5
GJB2XM_011535049.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.368C>A p.Thr123Asn missense_variant 2/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GJB2ENST00000382848.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.368C>A p.Thr123Asn missense_variant 2/21 NM_004004.6 P1
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.368C>A p.Thr123Asn missense_variant 1/1 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000210
AC:
32
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00559
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000508
AC:
127
AN:
250204
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000465
AC XY:
63
AN XY:
135386
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00653
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000442
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000192
AC:
281
AN:
1461444
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000193
AC XY:
140
AN XY:
727046
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00622
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000189
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000204
AC:
31
AN:
152330
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00541
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000527
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000283
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000544
AC:
66
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 06, 2019Variant summary: GJB2 c.368C>A (p.Thr123Asn) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the central part of the cytoplasmic loop (CL) domain (Locke 2009) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. One study indicates potential phosphorylation at this residue, however the functional significance of this post-translational modification is unknown (Locke 2009). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00059 in 255584 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0065 in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. This frequency is lower than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic GJB2 variant (0.025) (when considering autosomal recessive inheritance). However, in certain East Asian subpopulations even higher occurrences were reported e.g. in Koreans it was found at a frequency of 0.01 (gnomAD 2.1); that suggests the variant is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. This variant has been reported in multiple nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSHL) patients (mainly East Asian ethnicity) without strong evidence for causality. The high occurrence in controls and the co-occurrence of other GJB2 disease variants in at least 2 patients argue against a potential dominant inheritance pattern (Dai 2009, Wu 2016). Many studies have reported the variant in patients with comparable frequencies (or lower than) detected in controls (e.g. Dai 2009, Nishio 2017), supporting the benign nature of this variant. A co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant (c.235delC) in trans was reported in a normal-hearing carrier (He 2017); further supporting a benign role for the variant. Though some studies raised the possibility that this variant can contribute to multigenic disorders, postulating that a combination of this variant with heterozygous alterations in other genes may be implicated in deafness (Chow 2017, Wu 2016), they provided no convincing evidence for the causative relationship. Two other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and both of these laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 10, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 09, 2011Thr123Asn in exon 2 of GJB2: This variant has been previously reported in patien ts with hearing loss as well as in control subjects as a rare polymorphism (Park 2000, Tang 2006, Cryns 2004, Dai 2009, Hwa 2003, Oguchi 2005, Ohtsuka 2003, Shi 2004, Snoeckx 2005). The allele frequencies of this variant are higher in the c ontrol group (~0.9%) than in the patient group (~0.4%), suggesting that this var iant does not have clinical significance. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 03, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 22, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15504600, 19043807, 12792423, 15700112, 16380907, 12172394, 22613756, 12560944, 20497192, 31992338, 28900111, 19715472, 30245029, 25262649, 25266519, 10983956, 20607074, 19366456, 14985372, 23638949, 23826813, 17041943, 25388846, 22384008, 22695344, 25493717, 17666888, 20593197, 21162657) -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBaylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Autosomal dominant keratitis-ichthyosis-hearing loss syndrome;C0265964:Mutilating keratoderma;C0266004:Knuckle pads, deafness AND leukonychia syndrome;C1835672:Palmoplantar keratoderma-deafness syndrome;C1844678:X-linked mixed hearing loss with perilymphatic gusher;C1865234:Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss;C2673759:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A;C2675750:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 01, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.066
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
Cadd
Benign
1.5
Dann
Benign
0.69
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.47
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.9
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.10
N
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.75
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.30
N;N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.79
N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.55
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.67
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;B
Vest4
0.036
MVP
0.55
MPC
0.042
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
-9.9
Varity_R
0.024
gMVP
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033188; hg19: chr13-20763353; API