rs1114167279
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001161546.2(PROB1):c.671G>A(p.Gly224Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000432 in 1,389,224 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001161546.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PROB1 | NM_001161546.2 | c.671G>A | p.Gly224Asp | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000434752.4 | NP_001155018.1 | |
SPATA24 | XM_005271916.5 | c.*1794G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | XP_005271973.1 | |||
SPATA24 | XM_011543252.3 | c.*1794G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | XP_011541554.1 | |||
SPATA24 | XM_011543253.3 | c.*1794G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | XP_011541555.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PROB1 | ENST00000434752.4 | c.671G>A | p.Gly224Asp | missense_variant | 1/1 | NM_001161546.2 | ENSP00000416033 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151996Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000242 AC: 3AN: 1237120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000167 AC XY: 1AN XY: 598976
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152104Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Keratoconus 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 21, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at