rs111430410

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_003000.3(SDHB):​c.32G>A​(p.Arg11His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00034 in 1,612,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R11C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SDHB
NM_003000.3 missense

Scores

2
4
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:2B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.84
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHB (HGNC:10681): (succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B) This tumor suppressor gene encodes the iron-sulfur protein subunit of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex which plays a critical role in mitochondria. The SDH enzyme complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits. This enzyme complex converts succinate to fumarate which releases electrons as part of the citric acid cycle, and the enzyme complex additionally provides an attachment site for released electrons to be transferred to the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. The SDH enzyme complex plays a role in oxygen-related gene regulation through its conversion of succinate, which is an oxygen sensor that stabilizes the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) transcription factor. Sporadic and familial mutations in this gene result in paragangliomas, pheochromocytoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, supporting a link between mitochondrial dysfunction and tumorigenesis. Mutations in this gene are also implicated in nuclear type 4 mitochondrial complex II deficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007355809).
BP6
Variant 1-17053988-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-17053988-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36768.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr1-17053988-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00171 (260/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00601 (250/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0054. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 130 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SDHBNM_003000.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.32G>A p.Arg11His missense_variant 1/8 ENST00000375499.8 NP_002991.2 P21912
SDHBNM_001407361.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.32G>A p.Arg11His missense_variant 1/8 NP_001394290.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SDHBENST00000375499.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.32G>A p.Arg11His missense_variant 1/81 NM_003000.3 ENSP00000364649.3 P21912
SDHBENST00000466613.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.44G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/32
SDHBENST00000485515.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.20G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/75 ENSP00000519322.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00166
AC:
252
AN:
152208
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00584
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000391
AC:
95
AN:
242914
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000340
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
132346
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00521
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000350
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000507
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000198
AC:
289
AN:
1460636
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000183
AC XY:
133
AN XY:
726572
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00676
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000747
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00171
AC:
260
AN:
152326
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00175
AC XY:
130
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00601
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000352
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00179
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00681
AC:
30
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000445
AC:
54

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 10, 2020The p.Arg11His variant in SDHB is classified as benign because it has high allele frequency. Although, ithas been reported in 1 individual with bilateral renal cell carcinoma (Ricketts 2008 PMID: 18728283), 1 individual with a neuroendocrine tumor but whose tumor was positive for SDHB immunostaining (van Nederveen 2009 PMID: 19576851), and classified as a VUS by Amendola (2015 PMID: 25637381) and Dorschner (2013 PMID: 24055113), it was also identified in 0.55% (133/24062) African chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 36768). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, BS4. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 05, 2021Variant summary: SDHB c.32G>A (p.Arg11His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00054 in 274908 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0055 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 629 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SDHB causing Pheochromocytoma phenotype (8.8e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.32G>A has been reported in the literature in at least an individual affected with adrenal Pheochromocytoma. However, the authors classified the variant as likely benign based on normal succinate: fumarate ratio obtained from a mass spectrometry-based screening assay performed on patient derived tissue samples (Richter_2019). Six other ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 28, 2022- -
Paragangliomas 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 24, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 16, 2018- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 17, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 01, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedresearchSection on Medical Neuroendocrinolgy, National Institutes of Health-- -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Variant Interpretation Group UK, Institute of Cancer Research, LondonMar 11, 2022Data included in classification: Allele frequency is above 1x10-4 in gnomAD (77/14092 alleles in African population, MAF 0.5%, 92/114849 = MAF of 0.08% across all populations in gnomAD) (BA1_SA) Data not included in classification: Revel score 0.627 Observed in 3 UK probands with phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma, one of which head and neck. Also observed in UK proband with 3 renal carcinomas, all with loss of SDHB on IHC -
Paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Variant Interpretation Group UK, Institute of Cancer Research, LondonMar 11, 2022Data included in classification: Allele frequency is above 1x10-4 in gnomAD (77/14092 alleles in African population, MAF 0.5%, 92/114849 = MAF of 0.08% across all populations in gnomAD) (BA1_SA) Data not included in classification: Revel score 0.627 Observed in 3 UK probands with phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma, one of which head and neck. Also observed in UK proband with 3 renal carcinomas, all with loss of SDHB on IHC -
Pheochromocytoma;C0238198:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor;C1861848:Paragangliomas 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 21, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24092654, 28374168, 24055113, 25637381, 26332594, 22835832, 18728283, 19576851, 30050099) -
Paraganglioma;C0031511:Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Variant Interpretation Group UK, Institute of Cancer Research, LondonJul 10, 2020This variant has been observed in a 52-year-old proband diagnosed with three primary renal cell carcinomas, bilateral disease, multiple renal cysts and single angiomyolipoma. This variant has also been observed in three unrelated (to our knowledge) diagnostic cases of PP/PGL (one of which has inner ear PGL). This variant has previously been reported in the literature in patients with bilateral renal cell carcinoma (PMID: 18728283) and neuroendocrine tumour (PMID: 19576851). Succinate:Fumarate ratio in tumour samples from a patient with this variant were observed to be within normal range, indicating neutral impact on protein function (PMID: 30050099) (BS3_supporting). This variant has been observed in 149/274308 total alleles in gnomAD; including 133/24062 African alleles (BS1_strong). Data included in classification: Functional data and control (gnomAD) data Data not included in classification: Incidence in literature and other reported probands In silico predictions (conflicting) -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
SDHB-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 23, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Pheochromocytoma;C0238198:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor;C1847319:Carney-Stratakis syndrome;C1861848:Paragangliomas 4;C5543176:Mitochondrial complex 2 deficiency, nuclear type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 04, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.049
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.16
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.29
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.37
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.35
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.62
T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.65
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0074
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.61
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.50
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.63
Sift
Benign
0.12
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.064
T
Polyphen
0.87
P
Vest4
0.29
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.048
T
GERP RS
4.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.063
gMVP
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111430410; hg19: chr1-17380483; API