Menu
GeneBe

rs111619594

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):c.958A>T(p.Ser320Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000302 in 1,609,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM67
NM_153704.6 missense

Scores

7
6
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:13B:1O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.64
Variant links:
Genes affected
TMEM67 (HGNC:28396): (transmembrane protein 67) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the primary cilium and to the plasma membrane. The gene functions in centriole migration to the apical membrane and formation of the primary cilium. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Meckel syndrome type 3 (MKS3) and Joubert syndrome type 6 (JBTS6). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.029471219).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TMEM67NM_153704.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.958A>T p.Ser320Cys missense_variant 9/28 ENST00000453321.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TMEM67ENST00000453321.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.958A>T p.Ser320Cys missense_variant 9/281 NM_153704.6 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000821
AC:
125
AN:
152252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000390
AC:
98
AN:
251056
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000339
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000244
AC:
356
AN:
1456834
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000244
AC XY:
177
AN XY:
724950
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00258
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000335
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000465
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000283
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000853
AC:
130
AN:
152370
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000738
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
74514
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000254
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000926
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00340
AC:
15
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000453
AC:
55
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3472
EpiCase
AF:
0.000600
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:13Benign:1Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 29, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 31, 2023Observed in an individual in published literature who was also found to have another TMEM67 variant (G218A) on the same allele (in cis), and had a different genetic etiology for the phenotype (Leitch et al., 2008); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20981092, 20690115, 27336129, 20301537, 34426522, 18327255) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
COACH syndrome 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsDec 26, 2019This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CenterMar 29, 2024- -
Meckel syndrome, type 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 15, 2023Variant summary: TMEM67 c.958A>T (p.Ser320Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 251056 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in TMEM67 causing Joubert Syndrome 6 (0.00039 vs 0.004), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.958A>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Bardet-Biedl syndrome and Cohen syndrome, in which pathogenic variants from other genes were identified to be the genetic cause (example, Dixon-Salazar_2012, Leitch_2008). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Joubert Syndrome 6. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect as the Zebrafish modeling and the rescuing phenotype of developmental delay are not appropriate for evaluating this variant (Leitch_2008). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 22700954, 18327255). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 (VUS, n=7, Likely benign, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
RHYNS syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaOct 02, 2019This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PP3. -
Nephronophthisis 11 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
TMEM67-related condition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 09, 2023The TMEM67 c.958A>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ser320Cys. The TMEM67 c.653G>C and c.958A>T variants have been reported in cis phase in a patient with Bardet-Biedl syndrome who was homozygous for a CEP290 nonsense variant (Leitch et al 2008. PubMed ID: 18327255). This variant is reported in 0.30% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/8-94793190-A-T). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Joubert syndrome 6 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 23, 2024- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14, modifier of Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMApr 01, 2008- -
Nephronophthisis Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.23
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.057
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.14
Cadd
Uncertain
26
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.80
D;D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.74
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.70
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.44
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.029
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.95
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
A;A
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.2
D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.83
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.
Vest4
0.67, 0.67
MVP
1.0
MPC
0.55
ClinPred
0.084
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.39
gMVP
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111619594; hg19: chr8-94793190; API