rs11212587

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6067G>A(p.Gly2023Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00155 in 1,612,772 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:7B:22O:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

ATM links:

C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

C11orf65 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15664351).

BP6

Variant 11-108315883-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108315883-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127416.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Benign=5, Likely_benign=14, not_provided=3}. Variant chr11-108315883-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00125 (190/152254) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00226 (154/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00197. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 82 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATM	NM_000051.4 link	c.6067G>A	p.Gly2023Arg	missense_variant	Exon 41 of 63	ENST00000675843.1	NP_000042.3	Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATM	ENST00000675843.1 link	c.6067G>A	p.Gly2023Arg	missense_variant	Exon 41 of 63		NM_000051.4	ENSP00000501606.1		Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00125

AC:

190

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000314

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000786

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000755

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00143

AC:

360

AN:

251402

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00150

AC XY:

204

AN XY:

135870

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000832

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00238

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00158

AC:

2306

AN:

1460518

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00159

AC XY:

1152

AN XY:

726704

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000962

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000153

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000626

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000899

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00125

AC:

190

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00110

AC XY:

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000313

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000755

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.00210

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00132

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00162

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00285

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000682

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00314

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00157

AC:

191

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00273

EpiControl

AF:

0.00225

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:7Benign:22Other:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:9Other:1

Jun 17, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26976419, 26787654, 26094658, 27153395, 21933854, 29445900, 26053404, 19404735, 11505391, 17393301, 12810666, 22529920, 23091097, 17968022, 12149228, 16461462, 21787400, 19781682, 24728327, 25624042, 26898890, 27664052, 25980754, 24584352, 27150160, 26483394, 26822149, 27882345, 25625042, 27498913, 28608266, 29678143, 23555315, 26822949, 27621404, 28779002, 30197789, 31108397, 30309722, 31159747, 30303537, 32854451) -

Dec 19, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 21, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The ATM c.6067G>A (p.Gly2023Arg) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 397/277154 (1 homozygote) control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.002368 (300/126680). This frequency is about 2 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATM variant (0.0010005), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. Multiple publications have cited the variant in affected BrC pts, along with multiple somatic occurrences in MCL and CLL pts. Skowronska_2012 suggestions, biallelic ATM inactivation in CLL patients was associated with disease progression and reduced survival. However, the variant has been reported to co-occur with a BRCA1 variant, although the exact variant was not indicated (Thorstenson_2003). In addition, two internal LCA samples report the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic ATM variant, c.6095G>A (p.Arg20232Lys) and BRCA1 variant, c.1326T>A (p.Cys442X). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories cite the variant as "likely benign/benign." Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Feb 17, 2023

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS1 -

Oct 20, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ATM: BS1:Supporting -

GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 02-18-2016 by Lab GenPath. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Jun 10, 2022

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Skane University Hospital Lund

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:3Benign:3

Aug 01, 2018

GeneKor MSA

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Jul 27, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 16, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 17, 2020

Spanish ATM Cancer Susceptibility Variant Interpretation Working Group

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.6067G>A (p.Gly2023Arg) variant has an allele frequency of 0.0014 (0.14%, 374/268,256 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer dataset, with a maximal frequency of 0.0023 (0.232%, 274/118,126 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) subpopulation (BS1; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This missense variant is not predicted to lead to a splicing alteration as per SPiCE predictor and no splicing site is created/activated according to at least 3 splicing predictors of the set SpliceSiteFinderlike - MaxEntScan - NNSplice - GeneSplicer, but it alters the protein function / structure on the in-silico prediction reports of REVEL and PROVEAN (PP3). There is no other supporting data that meet criteria for consideration. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. Adapted ACMG/AMP rules applied as defined by the Spanish ATM working group: BS1 + PP3 (PMID: 33280026). -

Feb 11, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1

Jul 14, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 22, 2023

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

GenomeConnect - Brain Gene Registry

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported on 02-03-2017 by Baylor Medical Genetics Laboratories. Assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient provided laboratory report. GenomeConnect does not attempt to reinterpret the variant. The IDDRC-CTSA National Brain Gene Registry (BGR) is a study funded by the U.S. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and includes 13 Intellectual and Developmental Disability Research Center (IDDRC) institutions. The study is led by Principal Investigator Dr. Philip Payne from Washington University. The BGR is a data commons of gene variants paired with subject clinical information. This database helps scientists learn more about genetic changes and their impact on the brain and behavior. Participation in the Brain Gene Registry requires participation in GenomeConnect. More information about the Brain Gene Registry can be found on the study website - https://braingeneregistry.wustl.edu/. -

not specified

Benign:3Other:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 30, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1Benign:1

May 30, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -

Dec 05, 2018

Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tip-toe gait

Pathogenic:1

Practice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice Pomarino

Significance: Likely pathogenic

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Gait disorder -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Mar 30, 2023

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The ATM p.Gly2023Arg variant was identified in 15 of 8674 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with CLL, lymphoid neoplasms, colorectal or breast cancer and was identified in 2 of 1602 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from healthy individuals (Broeks 2008, Gronbaek 2002, Mangone 2015, Paglia 2010, Podralska 2018, Skowronska 2012, Thorstenson 2003, Yurgelun 2015, Balmana 2016, Tung 2016). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11212587) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by two clinical laboratories; as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and three other submitters; as uncertain significance by one submitter), Cosmic (3x in Large intestine, or Haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue), MutDB, and in LOVD 3.0 (3x) databases. The variant was not identified in COGR. The variant was identified in control databases in 397 of 277154 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 10 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Other in 7 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 36 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 300 of 126680 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), East Asian in 1 of 18852 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), Finnish in 22 of 25778 chromosomes (freq: 0.0009), and South Asian in 20 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007). The p.Gly2023 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In silico analysis predicted the variant induces or contributes to increased exon skipping (Caminsky 2016). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.42

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.11

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.070

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.14

T;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.80

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.78

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;.

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.28

MetaRNN

Benign

0.16

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.6

M;M

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.66

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.5

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.51

Sift

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D

Vest4

0.83

MutPred

0.54

Loss of ubiquitination at K2025 (P = 0.0258);Loss of ubiquitination at K2025 (P = 0.0258);

MVP

0.96

MPC

0.62

ClinPred

0.056

GERP RS

5.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.81

gMVP

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over