rs11212587
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6067G>A(p.Gly2023Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00155 in 1,612,772 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 4 hom. )
Consequence
ATM
NM_000051.4 missense
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
4
10
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.47
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15664351).
BP6
Variant 11-108315883-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108315883-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127416.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=14, not_provided=3, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=6}. Variant chr11-108315883-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00125 (190/152254) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00226 (154/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00197. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 82 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.6067G>A | p.Gly2023Arg | missense_variant | 41/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.6067G>A | p.Gly2023Arg | missense_variant | 41/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00125 AC: 190AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
190
AN:
152136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00143 AC: 360AN: 251402Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 204AN XY: 135870
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
360
AN:
251402
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
204
AN XY:
135870
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00158 AC: 2306AN: 1460518Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00159 AC XY: 1152AN XY: 726704
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2306
AN:
1460518
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1152
AN XY:
726704
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00125 AC: 190AN: 152254Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00110 AC XY: 82AN XY: 74436
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
190
AN:
152254
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
82
AN XY:
74436
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
11
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
27
ExAC
AF:
AC:
191
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:7Benign:22Other:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:9Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network | - | Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 02-18-2016 by Lab GenPath. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 17, 2023 | BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Skane University Hospital Lund | Jun 10, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 21, 2017 | Variant summary: The ATM c.6067G>A (p.Gly2023Arg) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 397/277154 (1 homozygote) control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.002368 (300/126680). This frequency is about 2 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATM variant (0.0010005), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. Multiple publications have cited the variant in affected BrC pts, along with multiple somatic occurrences in MCL and CLL pts. Skowronska_2012 suggestions, biallelic ATM inactivation in CLL patients was associated with disease progression and reduced survival. However, the variant has been reported to co-occur with a BRCA1 variant, although the exact variant was not indicated (Thorstenson_2003). In addition, two internal LCA samples report the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic ATM variant, c.6095G>A (p.Arg20232Lys) and BRCA1 variant, c.1326T>A (p.Cys442X). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories cite the variant as "likely benign/benign." Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 20, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 17, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26976419, 26787654, 26094658, 27153395, 21933854, 29445900, 26053404, 19404735, 11505391, 17393301, 12810666, 22529920, 23091097, 17968022, 12149228, 16461462, 21787400, 19781682, 24728327, 25624042, 26898890, 27664052, 25980754, 24584352, 27150160, 26483394, 26822149, 27882345, 25625042, 27498913, 28608266, 29678143, 23555315, 26822949, 27621404, 28779002, 30197789, 31108397, 30309722, 31159747, 30303537, 32854451) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 18, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | ATM: BS1:Supporting - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 19, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 11, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Mar 16, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Spanish ATM Cancer Susceptibility Variant Interpretation Working Group | Jun 17, 2020 | The c.6067G>A (p.Gly2023Arg) variant has an allele frequency of 0.0014 (0.14%, 374/268,256 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer dataset, with a maximal frequency of 0.0023 (0.232%, 274/118,126 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) subpopulation (BS1; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This missense variant is not predicted to lead to a splicing alteration as per SPiCE predictor and no splicing site is created/activated according to at least 3 splicing predictors of the set SpliceSiteFinderlike - MaxEntScan - NNSplice - GeneSplicer, but it alters the protein function / structure on the in-silico prediction reports of REVEL and PROVEAN (PP3). There is no other supporting data that meet criteria for consideration. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. Adapted ACMG/AMP rules applied as defined by the Spanish ATM working group: BS1 + PP3 (PMID: 33280026). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 27, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneKor MSA | Aug 01, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 08, 2020 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Aug 22, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 18, 2020 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Brain Gene Registry | - | Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported on 02-03-2017 by Baylor Medical Genetics Laboratories. Assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient provided laboratory report. GenomeConnect does not attempt to reinterpret the variant. The IDDRC-CTSA National Brain Gene Registry (BGR) is a study funded by the U.S. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and includes 13 Intellectual and Developmental Disability Research Center (IDDRC) institutions. The study is led by Principal Investigator Dr. Philip Payne from Washington University. The BGR is a data commons of gene variants paired with subject clinical information. This database helps scientists learn more about genetic changes and their impact on the brain and behavior. Participation in the Brain Gene Registry requires participation in GenomeConnect. More information about the Brain Gene Registry can be found on the study website - https://braingeneregistry.wustl.edu/. - |
not specified Benign:3Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 30, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Dec 05, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 30, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Tip-toe gait Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Practice for Gait Abnormalities, David Pomarino, Competency Network Toe Walking c/o Practice Pomarino | - | Gait disorder - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 30, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Gly2023Arg variant was identified in 15 of 8674 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with CLL, lymphoid neoplasms, colorectal or breast cancer and was identified in 2 of 1602 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from healthy individuals (Broeks 2008, Gronbaek 2002, Mangone 2015, Paglia 2010, Podralska 2018, Skowronska 2012, Thorstenson 2003, Yurgelun 2015, Balmana 2016, Tung 2016). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11212587) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by two clinical laboratories; as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and three other submitters; as uncertain significance by one submitter), Cosmic (3x in Large intestine, or Haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue), MutDB, and in LOVD 3.0 (3x) databases. The variant was not identified in COGR. The variant was identified in control databases in 397 of 277154 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 10 of 24034 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Other in 7 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 36 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 300 of 126680 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), East Asian in 1 of 18852 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), Finnish in 22 of 25778 chromosomes (freq: 0.0009), and South Asian in 20 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007). The p.Gly2023 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In silico analysis predicted the variant induces or contributes to increased exon skipping (Caminsky 2016). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
D;D
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of ubiquitination at K2025 (P = 0.0258);Loss of ubiquitination at K2025 (P = 0.0258);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at