rs112335417
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000478.6(ALPL):c.1119C>T(p.Thr373=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00145 in 1,614,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 36 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0078 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 13 hom. )
Consequence
ALPL
NM_000478.6 synonymous
NM_000478.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.76
Genes affected
ALPL (HGNC:438): (alkaline phosphatase, biomineralization associated) This gene encodes a member of the alkaline phosphatase family of proteins. There are at least four distinct but related alkaline phosphatases: intestinal, placental, placental-like, and liver/bone/kidney (tissue non-specific). The first three are located together on chromosome 2, while the tissue non-specific form is located on chromosome 1. The product of this gene is a membrane bound glycosylated enzyme that is not expressed in any particular tissue and is, therefore, referred to as the tissue-nonspecific form of the enzyme. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature enzyme. This enzyme may play a role in bone mineralization. Mutations in this gene have been linked to hypophosphatasia, a disorder that is characterized by hypercalcemia and skeletal defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 1-21575854-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-21575854-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 295548.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-21575854-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.76 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00784 (1194/152340) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0275 (1142/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0261. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 573 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALPL | NM_000478.6 | c.1119C>T | p.Thr373= | synonymous_variant | 10/12 | ENST00000374840.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALPL | ENST00000374840.8 | c.1119C>T | p.Thr373= | synonymous_variant | 10/12 | 1 | NM_000478.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00782 AC: 1190AN: 152222Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1190
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00200 AC: 504AN: 251494Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00152 AC XY: 207AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
504
AN:
251494
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000789 AC: 1154AN: 1461892Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000666 AC XY: 484AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1154
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
484
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00784 AC: 1194AN: 152340Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00769 AC XY: 573AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1194
AN:
152340
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
573
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 11, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 02, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 26, 2020 | - - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jan 08, 2021 | - - |
Hypophosphatasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at