rs113013085
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000271.5(NPC1):c.2073G>A(p.Pro691Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00649 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000271.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPC1 | NM_000271.5 | c.2073G>A | p.Pro691Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 25 | ENST00000269228.10 | NP_000262.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPC1 | ENST00000269228.10 | c.2073G>A | p.Pro691Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 25 | 1 | NM_000271.5 | ENSP00000269228.4 | ||
NPC1 | ENST00000591051.1 | c.1149G>A | p.Pro383Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 18 | 2 | ENSP00000467636.1 | |||
NPC1 | ENST00000540608.5 | n.1987G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 11 of 16 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00489 AC: 744AN: 152168Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00536 AC: 1347AN: 251440Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00578 AC XY: 786AN XY: 135900
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00666 AC: 9731AN: 1461872Hom.: 49 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00674 AC XY: 4905AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00488 AC: 743AN: 152286Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00467 AC XY: 348AN XY: 74462
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 Benign:7
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:4
NPC1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF, Silent variant. -
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
NPC1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at