rs1135320

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_006261.5(PROP1):ā€‹c.27T>Cā€‹(p.Ala9=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.452 in 1,613,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 168,297 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.42 ( 14007 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.46 ( 154290 hom. )

Consequence

PROP1
NM_006261.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.04
Variant links:
Genes affected
PROP1 (HGNC:9455): (PROP paired-like homeobox 1) This gene encodes a paired-like homeodomain transcription factor in the developing pituitary gland. Expression occurs prior to and is required for expression of pou domain transcription factor 1, which is responsible for pituitary development and hormone expression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with combined pituitary hormone deficiency-2 as well as deficiencies in luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, growth hormone, prolactin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.95).
BP6
Variant 5-177995907-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177995907-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 353017.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-177995907-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.04 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.563 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PROP1NM_006261.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.27T>C p.Ala9= synonymous_variant 1/3 ENST00000308304.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PROP1ENST00000308304.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.27T>C p.Ala9= synonymous_variant 1/31 NM_006261.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.418
AC:
63531
AN:
151834
Hom.:
13996
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.282
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.501
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.508
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.526
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.568
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.578
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.490
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.599
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.439
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.467
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.483
AC:
121262
AN:
251114
Hom.:
30162
AF XY:
0.489
AC XY:
66388
AN XY:
135772
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.276
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.556
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.525
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.577
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.577
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.485
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.446
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.479
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.455
AC:
665221
AN:
1461196
Hom.:
154290
Cov.:
50
AF XY:
0.459
AC XY:
334033
AN XY:
726966
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.279
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.550
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.526
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.622
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.577
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.483
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.438
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.459
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.418
AC:
63579
AN:
151952
Hom.:
14007
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.426
AC XY:
31626
AN XY:
74270
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.282
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.508
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.526
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.568
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.581
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.490
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.439
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.470
Alfa
AF:
0.427
Hom.:
7205
Bravo
AF:
0.417
Asia WGS
AF:
0.552
AC:
1916
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.463
EpiControl
AF:
0.459

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Pituitary hormone deficiency, combined, 2 Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 25, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 27, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 09, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.95
CADD
Benign
2.6
DANN
Benign
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1135320; hg19: chr5-177422908; COSMIC: COSV57645313; API