rs113811959

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_001008212.2(OPTN):c.489A>G(p.Glu163Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00186 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

OPTN
NM_001008212.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.432

Variant links:

Genes affected

OPTN (HGNC:17142): (optineurin) This gene encodes the coiled-coil containing protein optineurin. Optineurin may play a role in normal-tension glaucoma and adult-onset primary open angle glaucoma. Optineurin interacts with adenovirus E3-14.7K protein and may utilize tumor necrosis factor-alpha or Fas-ligand pathways to mediate apoptosis, inflammation or vasoconstriction. Optineurin may also function in cellular morphogenesis and membrane trafficking, vesicle trafficking, and transcription activation through its interactions with the RAB8, huntingtin, and transcription factor IIIA proteins. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding the same protein. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OPTN links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 10-13112572-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-13112572-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 256881.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-13112572-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.432 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OPTN	NM_001008212.2 link	c.489A>G	p.Glu163Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 15	ENST00000378747.8	NP_001008213.1	Q96CV9-1
OPTN	NM_001008211.1 link	c.489A>G	p.Glu163Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 16		NP_001008212.1	Q96CV9-1
OPTN	NM_001008213.1 link	c.489A>G	p.Glu163Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 16		NP_001008214.1	Q96CV9-1
OPTN	NM_021980.4 link	c.489A>G	p.Glu163Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 14		NP_068815.2	Q96CV9-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OPTN	ENST00000378747.8 link	c.489A>G	p.Glu163Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 15	1	NM_001008212.2	ENSP00000368021.3		Q96CV9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00151

AC:

230

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0252

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000471

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00243

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00157

AC:

394

AN:

251486

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00176

AC XY:

239

AN XY:

135918

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000954

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00147

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000693

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00229

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00189

AC:

2765

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00186

AC XY:

1351

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000687

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00314

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00167

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000749

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00204

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00210

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00152

AC:

231

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00144

AC XY:

107

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000471

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00244

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.00230

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00169

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00354

EpiControl

AF:

0.00332

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Mar 11, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

OPTN: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2023

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 12

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Primary open angle glaucoma;C1842026:Glaucoma 1, open angle, E;C3150692:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 12

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary open angle glaucoma

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

5.7

DANN

Benign

0.66

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over