rs114446594

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.231T>G​(p.Thr77Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000326 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.09
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 13-32319240-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32319240-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 51269.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32319240-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32319240-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.09 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000172 (251/1461418) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0066 (221/33468). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00589. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 117 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.231T>G p.Thr77Thr synonymous_variant 3/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.231T>G p.Thr77Thr synonymous_variant 3/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893 linkuse as main transcriptc.-139T>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/271 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.231T>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
275
AN:
152210
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000465
AC:
117
AN:
251376
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000375
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
135874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00672
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000172
AC:
251
AN:
1461418
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
727050
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00660
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00181
AC:
275
AN:
152328
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00180
AC XY:
134
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000550
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00206
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ClinVar: 5 B/LB; Silent (meets our criteria for LB) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 29, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 08, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 17, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:5
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Sep 28, 2016Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.0113 (African), derived from 1000 genomes (2013-05-02). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganApr 21, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylMar 14, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUniversity of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology (LBCM)-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNov 30, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 14, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateNov 16, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 29, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 10, 2015- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicAug 02, 2017- -
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMar 18, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 06, 2023- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Thr77Thr variant has been identified in 22 out of 1134 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.019) in individuals with breast and ovarian cancer phenotype, and was not identified in 300 control chromosomes (Cherbal 2010, Hadjisawas 2004, Hadjisawas 2003, Fackenthal 2011, Baumbach-abstract). However, it is listed in dbSNP database (ID#: rs114446594) with an average heterozygosity of 0.005+/-0.051, therefore increasing the likelihood of this variant to be benign. This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, and is not located near a splice junction. In the UMD database, this variant has been identified in 3 (out of 10) individuals with breast or ovarian cancers, where a second pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was also detected, suggesting that this is a benign variant. In a recent study, partial exon 3 skipping was suggested to be associated with this variant, however this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity (Thery 2011). In summary, based on above information we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant, therefore this variant is classified as Benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs114446594; hg19: chr13-32893377; API