rs11479
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000252029.8(TYMP):c.1412C>T(p.Ser471Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0995 in 1,610,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,556 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S471S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000252029.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYMP | NM_001953.5 | c.1412C>T | p.Ser471Leu | missense_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000252029.8 | NP_001944.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYMP | ENST00000252029.8 | c.1412C>T | p.Ser471Leu | missense_variant | 10/10 | 1 | NM_001953.5 | ENSP00000252029 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0899 AC: 13689AN: 152208Hom.: 778 Cov.: 35
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.128 AC: 29384AN: 230034Hom.: 2415 AF XY: 0.125 AC XY: 15971AN XY: 127710
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.100 AC: 146515AN: 1458068Hom.: 8778 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.102 AC XY: 74188AN XY: 725332
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0899 AC: 13695AN: 152322Hom.: 778 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0928 AC XY: 6912AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 23, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 10, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 07, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | GeneReviews | Jan 14, 2016 | - - |
Spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Fatal Infantile Cardioencephalomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at