rs115832709

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):c.3325G>C(p.Ala1109Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00064 in 1,613,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A1109A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.51

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

CEP152 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly with or without short stature
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Seckel syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Seckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CEP152 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0037274063).

BP6

Variant 15-48755923-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48755923-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95652.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00352 (536/152170) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0125 (520/41512). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0116. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 240 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	NM_001194998.2 link	c.3325G>C	p.Ala1109Pro	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27	ENST00000380950.7	NP_001181927.1	O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	ENST00000380950.7 link	c.3325G>C	p.Ala1109Pro	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27	1	NM_001194998.2	ENSP00000370337.2	O94986-4
CEP152	ENST00000399334.7 link	c.3325G>C	p.Ala1109Pro	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 26	1		ENSP00000382271.3	O94986-3
CEP152	ENST00000325747.9 link	c.3046G>C	p.Ala1016Pro	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 25	1		ENSP00000321000.5	O94986-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00353

AC:

536

AN:

152052

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0126

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000786

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000806

AC:

201

AN:

249360

AF XY:

0.000621

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0124

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000203

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000340

AC:

497

AN:

1461596

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000279

AC XY:

203

AN XY:

727114

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0126

AC:

421

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000335

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53266

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000108

AC:

AN:

1111898

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000811

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

131

174

218

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00352

AC:

536

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00323

AC XY:

240

AN XY:

74408

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0125

AC:

520

AN:

41512

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000785

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

67998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2106

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

127

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000300

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00393

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00818

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00107

AC:

129

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Apr 19, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CEP152: BP4, BS1 -

not specified

Benign:2

Jun 22, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Seckel syndrome 5

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.19

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

0.057

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.78

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.033

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.5

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.6

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.065

LIST_S2

Benign

0.61

T;T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0037

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;L;.

PhyloP100

-1.5

PrimateAI

Benign

0.22

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.082

Sift

Benign

0.14

T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.26

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.47

P;.;P

Vest4

0.21

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.33

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

-5.8

Varity_R

0.17

gMVP

0.47

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over