rs11603779
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001289808.2(CRYAB):c.324+4T>G variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.281 in 1,613,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 64,777 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.27 ( 5663 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 ( 59114 hom. )
Consequence
CRYAB
NM_001289808.2 splice_donor_region, intron
NM_001289808.2 splice_donor_region, intron
Scores
15
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003259
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.714
Genes affected
CRYAB (HGNC:2389): (crystallin alpha B) Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families. Alpha crystallins are composed of two gene products: alpha-A and alpha-B, for acidic and basic, respectively. Alpha crystallins can be induced by heat shock and are members of the small heat shock protein (HSP20) family. They act as molecular chaperones although they do not renature proteins and release them in the fashion of a true chaperone; instead they hold them in large soluble aggregates. These heterogeneous aggregates consist of 30-40 subunits; the alpha-A and alpha-B subunits have a 3:1 ratio, respectively. Two additional functions of alpha crystallins are an autokinase activity and participation in the intracellular architecture. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. Alpha-A and alpha-B gene products are differentially expressed; alpha-A is preferentially restricted to the lens and alpha-B is expressed widely in many tissues and organs. Elevated expression of alpha-B crystallin occurs in many neurological diseases; a missense mutation cosegregated in a family with a desmin-related myopathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2019]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0039369464).
BP6
?
Variant 11-111910323-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-111910323-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44234.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-111910323-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.334 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRYAB | NM_001289808.2 | c.324+4T>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000650687.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRYAB | ENST00000650687.2 | c.324+4T>G | splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant | NM_001289808.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.268 AC: 40773AN: 151948Hom.: 5665 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
40773
AN:
151948
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.274 AC: 68923AN: 251388Hom.: 9761 AF XY: 0.277 AC XY: 37647AN XY: 135876
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
68923
AN:
251388
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
37647
AN XY:
135876
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.282 AC: 412753AN: 1461658Hom.: 59114 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.282 AC XY: 205345AN XY: 727140
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
412753
AN:
1461658
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
205345
AN XY:
727140
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.268 AC: 40778AN: 152066Hom.: 5663 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.268 AC XY: 19914AN XY: 74334
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
40778
AN:
152066
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
19914
AN XY:
74334
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1070
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1169
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
962
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2578
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
32718
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
796
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 27, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 21, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 10, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 04, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Fatal infantile hypertonic myofibrillar myopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Cataract 16 multiple types Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 11, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at