rs116089174

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):c.1909-8G>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,441,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0050 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00003090

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.433

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

CEP152 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly with or without short stature
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Seckel syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Seckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CEP152 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 15-48768336-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48768336-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 158235.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00497 (757/152254) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0175 (729/41542). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0165. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 358 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	NM_001194998.2 link	c.1909-8G>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 26	ENST00000380950.7	NP_001181927.1	O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	ENST00000380950.7 link	c.1909-8G>C	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 26	1	NM_001194998.2	ENSP00000370337.2	O94986-4
CEP152	ENST00000399334.7 link	c.1909-8G>C	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 25	1		ENSP00000382271.3	O94986-3
CEP152	ENST00000325747.9 link	c.1630-8G>C	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 13 of 24	1		ENSP00000321000.5	O94986-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00496

AC:

755

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0176

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000917

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00431

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00121

AC:

297

AN:

245398

AF XY:

0.000946

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0171

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000908

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000904

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000335

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000545

AC:

703

AN:

1289472

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000481

AC XY:

313

AN XY:

650742

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0187

AC:

563

AN:

30040

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00108

AC:

AN:

44296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25040

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

38824

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000485

AC:

AN:

82526

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53042

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000373

AC:

AN:

5362

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000230

AC:

AN:

955658

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00117

AC:

AN:

54684

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

128

160

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00497

AC:

757

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00481

AC XY:

358

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0175

AC:

729

AN:

41542

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000981

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00426

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

108

144

180

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00152

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00564

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Nov 17, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

CEP152-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 15, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 24, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

3.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.53

PhyloP100

-0.43

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000031

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over