rs117524265
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.728T>C(p.Ile243Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00796 in 1,614,250 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 100 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0073 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0080 ( 89 hom. )
Consequence
FBN2
NM_001999.4 missense
NM_001999.4 missense
Scores
1
8
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.46
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP2
?
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, FBN2
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01372388).
BP6
?
Variant 5-128464822-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128464822-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137358.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128464822-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00732 (1116/152358) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0489 (253/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0439. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 588 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 1121 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | NM_001999.4 | c.728T>C | p.Ile243Thr | missense_variant | 6/65 | ENST00000262464.9 | |
FBN2 | XM_017009228.3 | c.728T>C | p.Ile243Thr | missense_variant | 6/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.728T>C | p.Ile243Thr | missense_variant | 6/65 | 1 | NM_001999.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00736 AC: 1121AN: 152240Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
1121
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00973 AC: 2446AN: 251408Hom.: 45 AF XY: 0.00962 AC XY: 1307AN XY: 135868
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2446
AN:
251408
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1307
AN XY:
135868
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00803 AC: 11732AN: 1461892Hom.: 89 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00786 AC XY: 5719AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11732
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5719
AN XY:
727248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00732 AC: 1116AN: 152358Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00789 AC XY: 588AN XY: 74506
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
1116
AN:
152358
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
588
AN XY:
74506
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
21
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
20
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
52
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
1150
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
105
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 10, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16835936, 31426022) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | FBN2: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 29, 2017 | Variant summary: The FBN2 c.728T>C (p.Ile243Thr) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a missense substitution. The variant lies within a TB domain (InterPro) and 3/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in the large control database ExAC at a frequency of 0.009478 (1150/121334 control chromosomes [18 homozygotes]), which is approximately 7582 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FBN2 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In a study of 49 Marfan syndrome or suspected Marfan syndrome patients where several disease-related genes were sequenced, including FBN2, the variant was detected and described as a polymorphism (Sakai_FBN1_AJMGA_2006). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 14, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 20, 2015 | - - |
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Connective tissue disorder Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Aug 04, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 11, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Nov 13, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.;.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.;L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;T
Polyphen
P;.;P;P;P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.82
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at