rs11762213

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000245.4(MET):​c.144G>A​(p.Ala48Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0456 in 1,613,846 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,985 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.033 ( 108 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.047 ( 1877 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.559
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 7-116699228-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-116699228-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93567.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-116699228-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-116699228-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.559 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0505 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkc.144G>A p.Ala48Ala synonymous_variant 2/21 ENST00000397752.8 NP_000236.2 P08581-1A0A024R759

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkc.144G>A p.Ala48Ala synonymous_variant 2/211 NM_000245.4 ENSP00000380860.3 P08581-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0331
AC:
5028
AN:
152004
Hom.:
108
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0526
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0372
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00686
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0519
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0415
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0332
AC:
8281
AN:
249368
Hom.:
211
AF XY:
0.0338
AC XY:
4570
AN XY:
135280
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0305
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000556
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0534
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0389
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0469
AC:
68626
AN:
1461724
Hom.:
1877
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0456
AC XY:
33156
AN XY:
727160
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00902
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0265
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0152
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0559
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0395
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0331
AC:
5028
AN:
152122
Hom.:
108
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0310
AC XY:
2303
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0371
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00707
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0519
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0411
Alfa
AF:
0.0488
Hom.:
268
Bravo
AF:
0.0350
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00520
AC:
18
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0520
EpiControl
AF:
0.0545

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 06, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 17, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 18, 2016Variant summary: The MET c.144G>A (p.Ala48Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 3980/120670 (1/30, 106 homozygotes), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic MET variant of 1/666666, suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Multiple reputable clinical laboratories cite the variant as "benign." Therefore, the variant has been classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 03, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 30, 2018- -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
0.40
DANN
Benign
0.54
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.6

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11762213; hg19: chr7-116339282; COSMIC: COSV59257416; API