Menu
GeneBe

rs11818239

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.435G>A(p.Pro145=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00762 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 798 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P145P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 412 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0043 ( 386 hom. )

Consequence

BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.888
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 10-86900031-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86900031-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 183708.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-86900031-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.888 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.134 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BMPR1ANM_004329.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.435G>A p.Pro145= synonymous_variant 7/13 ENST00000372037.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BMPR1AENST00000372037.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.435G>A p.Pro145= synonymous_variant 7/131 NM_004329.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0394
AC:
6001
AN:
152132
Hom.:
406
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0311
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0107
AC:
2680
AN:
251326
Hom.:
160
AF XY:
0.00788
AC XY:
1070
AN XY:
135868
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.141
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00795
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000607
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00506
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00428
AC:
6259
AN:
1461800
Hom.:
386
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00368
AC XY:
2677
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00912
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000325
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000263
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0103
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0396
AC:
6032
AN:
152250
Hom.:
412
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0375
AC XY:
2795
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.137
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0308
Alfa
AF:
0.00381
Hom.:
53
Bravo
AF:
0.0456
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00982
AC:
36
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000981
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 28, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 08, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 28, 2018- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 12, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 09, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 22, 2020- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BMPR1A p.Pro145= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11818239) as “With Benign, Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Invitae, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano, ARUP, Color, Prevention Genetics and Mayo Clinic; and likely benign by True Health Diagnostics). The variant was identified in control databases in 3757 (239 homozygous) of 277074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.01 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017, observed in the following populations: African in 3359 (236 homozygous) of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.1), Other in 46 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), Latino in 269 (2 homozygous) of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.008), European Non-Finnish in 74 (1 homozygous) of 126644 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), East Asian in 1 of 18866 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), and South Asian in 8 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish and European Finnish populations. The p.Pro145= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence, 5 bases into exon 7, and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
Cadd
Benign
1.0
Dann
Benign
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11818239; hg19: chr10-88659788; API