rs11818239
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_004329.3(BMPR1A):c.435G>A(p.Pro145Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00762 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 798 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 412 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0043 ( 386 hom. )
Consequence
BMPR1A
NM_004329.3 synonymous
NM_004329.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.888
Genes affected
BMPR1A (HGNC:1076): (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A) The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors are a family of transmembrane serine/threonine kinases that include the type I receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B and the type II receptor BMPR2. These receptors are also closely related to the activin receptors, ACVR1 and ACVR2. The ligands of these receptors are members of the TGF-beta superfamily. TGF-betas and activins transduce their signals through the formation of heteromeric complexes with 2 different types of serine (threonine) kinase receptors: type I receptors of about 50-55 kD and type II receptors of about 70-80 kD. Type II receptors bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they require their respective type I receptors for signaling, whereas type I receptors require their respective type II receptors for ligand binding. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 10-86900031-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86900031-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 183708.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-86900031-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.888 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.134 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMPR1A | NM_004329.3 | c.435G>A | p.Pro145Pro | synonymous_variant | 7/13 | ENST00000372037.8 | NP_004320.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMPR1A | ENST00000372037.8 | c.435G>A | p.Pro145Pro | synonymous_variant | 7/13 | 1 | NM_004329.3 | ENSP00000361107.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0394 AC: 6001AN: 152132Hom.: 406 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6001
AN:
152132
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0107 AC: 2680AN: 251326Hom.: 160 AF XY: 0.00788 AC XY: 1070AN XY: 135868
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2680
AN:
251326
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1070
AN XY:
135868
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00428 AC: 6259AN: 1461800Hom.: 386 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00368 AC XY: 2677AN XY: 727208
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6259
AN:
1461800
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2677
AN XY:
727208
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0396 AC: 6032AN: 152250Hom.: 412 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0375 AC XY: 2795AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6032
AN:
152250
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2795
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
36
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 28, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 28, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 08, 2020 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 22, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 09, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Jan 12, 2018 | - - |
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Aug 01, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Polyposis syndrome, hereditary mixed, 2 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BMPR1A p.Pro145= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs11818239) as “With Benign, Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Invitae, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano, ARUP, Color, Prevention Genetics and Mayo Clinic; and likely benign by True Health Diagnostics). The variant was identified in control databases in 3757 (239 homozygous) of 277074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.01 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017, observed in the following populations: African in 3359 (236 homozygous) of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.1), Other in 46 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), Latino in 269 (2 homozygous) of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.008), European Non-Finnish in 74 (1 homozygous) of 126644 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), East Asian in 1 of 18866 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), and South Asian in 8 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish and European Finnish populations. The p.Pro145= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence, 5 bases into exon 7, and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at