rs118192148
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.14690G>A(p.Gly4897Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G4897V) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.14690G>A | p.Gly4897Asp | missense_variant | 102/106 | ENST00000359596.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.14690G>A | p.Gly4897Asp | missense_variant | 102/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 29
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
RYR1-related disorder Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Oct 24, 2017 | A different missense substitution at this codon (p.Gly4897Val) has been reported in a family with CCD (PMID: 17226826). However, the clinical significance of this variant is unknown. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. This missense change is located in a region of the RYR1 protein where a significant number of previously reported RYR1 missense mutations are found (PMID: 16084090). These observations suggest that a previously unreported missense substitution within this region may affect protein function, but experiments have not been done to test this possibility. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with central core disease (CCD) (PMID: 23919265, 24561095). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces glycine with aspartic acid at codon 4897 of the RYR1 protein (p.Gly4897Asp). The glycine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between glycine and aspartic acid. - |
not provided Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 17, 2018 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2023 | The c.14690G>A (p.G4897D) alteration is located in exon 102 (coding exon 102) of the RYR1 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 14690, causing the glycine (G) at amino acid position 4897 to be replaced by an aspartic acid (D). This variant was not reported in population-based cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The c.14690G>A alteration has been reported in multiple individuals with clinical features consistent with autosomal dominant RYR1-related myopathy (Gu, 2014; Cotta, 2022; Fusto, 2022, external communication). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. Based on internal structural analysis, G4897D disrupts the selectivity filter motif which has been shown to be functionally important (Balshaw, 1999; Lefebvre, 2013; Yan, 2015; Wei, 2016; Kushnir, 2020). This alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at