rs118192162
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PP1PS4_SupportingPS3PP3_Moderate
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of tyrosine with serine at codon 522 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Tyr522Ser). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is EAS: 0.00005, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. This variant has been reported in two unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, one of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4_Supporting (PMID:7829078, PMID:19020143). Functional studies in HEK293 cells show an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists. A knock-in mouse model supports pathogenicity of this variant demonstrating a malignant hyperthermia reaction in response to agonist, as well ex vivo studies showed increased response to agonist with increased calcium release, PS3 (PMID:31607937, PMID:9334205).This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID:21118704). This variant segregates with MHS in three individuals, PP1 ( PMID:7829078). A REVEL score >0.85 supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. This variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Criteria implemented: PS4_Supporting, PS3, PM1, PP1, PP3_Moderate. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA024286/MONDO:0007783/012
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.1565A>C | p.Tyr522Ser | missense_variant | 14/106 | ENST00000359596.8 | NP_000531.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.1565A>C | p.Tyr522Ser | missense_variant | 14/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | ENSP00000352608.2 | ||
RYR1 | ENST00000355481.8 | c.1565A>C | p.Tyr522Ser | missense_variant | 14/105 | 1 | ENSP00000347667.3 | |||
RYR1 | ENST00000599547.6 | n.1565A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 14/80 | 2 | ENSP00000471601.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 55
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:1Other:1
Pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Mar 18, 2021 | This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of tyrosine with serine at codon 522 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Tyr522Ser). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is EAS: 0.00005, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. This variant has been reported in two unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, one of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4_Supporting (PMID:7829078, PMID:19020143). Functional studies in HEK293 cells show an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists. A knock-in mouse model supports pathogenicity of this variant demonstrating a malignant hyperthermia reaction in response to agonist, as well ex vivo studies showed increased response to agonist with increased calcium release, PS3 (PMID:31607937, PMID:9334205).This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID: 21118704). This variant segregates with MHS in three individuals, PP1 ( PMID:7829078). A REVEL score >0.85 supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. This variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Criteria implemented: PS4_Supporting, PS3, PM1, PP1, PP3_Moderate. - |
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Sep 01, 1994 | - - |
methoxyflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
sevoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
isoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
enflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
halothane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
desflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
not provided Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1) | - | - - |
succinylcholine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at