rs118192163
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 14P and 4B. PP1_StrongPP3_ModerateBS2PS3_ModeratePM1PS4
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions.This sequence variant predicts a substitution of Arginine with Histidine at codon 2163 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Arg2163His). This variant is not present in a large population database (gnomAD) at the time this variant was interpreted. This variant has been reported in 16 unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, 14 of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4 (PMID:30236257, PMID:9497245, PMID:21455645, PMID:15731587, PMID:23558838). This variant has been identified in three individuals with negative IVCT/CHCT results, BS2 (PMID:30236257). Functional studies in HEK293 cells show an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID:9334205). Additional functional studies in dyspedic myotubes were published for this variant, this assay is not considered a standard assay by the ClinGen RYR1 VCEP for MHS (PMID:12732639, PMID:15347586). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID:21118704). This variant segregates with MHS in seven families, PP1_Strong (PMID:30236257, PMID:9497245). A REVEL score >0.85 (0.933) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. Based on using Bayes to combine criteria this variant is assessed as Pathogenic, (PMID:29300386). Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4, PM1, PP1_Strong, PP3_Moderate, BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA024593/MONDO:0007783/012
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.6488G>A | p.Arg2163His | missense_variant | 39/106 | ENST00000359596.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.6488G>A | p.Arg2163His | missense_variant | 39/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | A2 | |
RYR1 | ENST00000355481.8 | c.6488G>A | p.Arg2163His | missense_variant | 39/105 | 1 | P4 | ||
RYR1 | ENST00000599547.6 | c.6488G>A | p.Arg2163His | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 39/80 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461756Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727164
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:3Other:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 04, 2023 | Observed with a second variant on the opposite allele (in trans) in a patient with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita and respiratory impairment in published literature (Brackmann et al., 2018); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect: increased sensitivity to calcium- and halothane-induced intracellular calcium release when compared to the wild type channel (Tong et al., 1997; Avila et al., 2001); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 9873004, 20301565, 11524458, 30236257, 10757649, 16917943, 16732084, 16835904, 27586648, 28687594, 9497245, 35428369, 12124989, 12668474, 29169929, 19648156, 9334205) - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Mar 25, 2020 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1) | - | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 20, 2013 | - - |
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:1Other:1
Pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Mar 29, 2022 | This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of Arginine with Histidine at codon 2163 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Arg2163His). This variant is not present in a large population database (gnomAD) at the time this variant was interpreted. This variant has been reported in 16 unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction, 14 of these individuals had a positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (if the proband was unavailable for testing, a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation-positive relative was counted), PS4 (PMID:30236257, PMID:9497245, PMID:21455645, PMID:15731587, PMID:23558838). This variant has been identified in three individuals with negative IVCT/CHCT results, BS2 (PMID:30236257). Functional studies in HEK293 cells show an increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3_Moderate (PMID:9334205). Additional functional studies in dyspedic myotubes were published for this variant, this assay is not considered a standard assay by the ClinGen RYR1 VCEP for MHS (PMID:12732639, PMID:15347586). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID: 21118704). This variant segregates with MHS in seven families, PP1_Strong (PMID:30236257, PMID:9497245). A REVEL score >0.85 (0.933) supports a pathogenic status for this variant, PP3_Moderate. Based on using Bayes to combine criteria this variant is assessed as Pathogenic, (PMID: 29300386). Criteria implemented: PS3_Moderate, PS4, PM1, PP1_Strong, PP3_Moderate, BS2. - |
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Mar 01, 1998 | - - |
Central core myopathy Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | curation | GeneReviews | May 11, 2010 | - - |
RYR1-related disorder Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 31, 2023 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 2163 of the RYR1 protein (p.Arg2163His). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) with or without central core disease and/or severe congenital myopathy (PMID: 9497245, 12124989, 19648156, 29169929, 30236257). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 12974). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RYR1 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RYR1 function (PMID: 9334205, 9873004, 11524458, 27586648, 28687594). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. - |
methoxyflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
sevoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
isoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
enflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
halothane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
desflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
succinylcholine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at