rs118192168
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM5PP2PP3PP5_Strong
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.14545G>A(p.Val4849Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,613,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as drug response (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V4849F) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.14545G>A | p.Val4849Ile | missense_variant | 101/106 | ENST00000359596.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.14545G>A | p.Val4849Ile | missense_variant | 101/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251422Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000198 AC: 29AN: 1461856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74318
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:5
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 29, 2023 | This missense variant replaces valine with isoleucine at codon 4849 of the RYR1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies in HEK293 cells have shown cells expressing this variant have increased sensitivity to RYR1 agonists compared to cells expressing wild-type RYR1 (PMID: 28403410). This variant has been reported in over 15 individuals affected with malignant hyperthermia episodes and in more than 10 families affected with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (PMID: 15731587, 19346234, 19648156, 23558838, 24433488, 25960145, 28403410, 28527222, 30788618). It has been shown that this variant segregates with disease in at least 3 families (PMID: 28403410). This variant has been identified in 5/282784 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the available evidence, this variant is classified as Pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Jul 27, 2022 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | Jul 11, 2020 | ACMG classification criteria: PS4, PM2, PM3 - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Oct 20, 2021 | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:4Other:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Mar 23, 2023 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1) | - | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 08, 2016 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 25, 2022 | Observed as a single variant in several families with a history of both malignant hyperthermia and CCD, as well as in an individual with scapular winging, limb weakness and a muscle biopsy with increased internal nuclei (Carpenter et al., 2009; Loseth et al., 2013).; Observed in the heterozygous state in multiple families with malignant hyperthermia, confirmed by in vitro contracture testing (IVCT) (Miller et al., 2018); Functional studies showed that V4849I increases both receptor sensitivity to caffeine and resulting calcium release (Merritt et al., 2017); Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16372898, 32978841, 30788618, 31447099, 12136074, 17483490, 18253926, 23558838, 23329375, 22473935, 19648156, 17226826, 25958340, 16917943, 28818389, 29635721, 32381029, 30932294, 30291343, 28403410, 28527222, 30236257, 32665702, 32528171, 20681998) - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2022 | - - |
RYR1-related disorder Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 19, 2024 | This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 4849 of the RYR1 protein (p.Val4849Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs118192168, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal recessive RYR1-related myopathy (PMID: 12136074, 22473935, 28818389). In at least one individual the data is consistent with being in trans (on the opposite chromosome) from a pathogenic variant. This variant has also been reported in individual(s) with autosomal dominant malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (PMID: 19648156). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 12984). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on RYR1 protein function. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Greenwood Genetic Center Diagnostic Laboratories, Greenwood Genetic Center | Jun 06, 2023 | PS3, PM1, PM2, PP3, PP1 - |
Central core disease, autosomal recessive Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 01, 2008 | - - |
Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 01, 2008 | - - |
Malignant hyperthermia of anesthesia Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 11, 2020 | The p.Val4849Ile variant in RYR1 has been reported in >15 individuals with malignant hyperthermia, and segregated in >15 affected family members (Brandom 2013, Broman 2009, Snoeck 2015, Klinger 2014, Carpenter 2009). It has also been reported in 3 individuals with recurrent rhabdomyolysis or myalgia with hyperCKemia and two individuals with late onset axial myopathy (Witting 2018, Loseth 2013, Snoeck 2015). Furthermore, this variant has been reported in the compound heterozygous state in 5 individuals with congenital myopathy, central core disease, or centronuclear myopathy (Ducreux 2006, Kraeva 2015, Abath Neto 2017, Kossugue 2007, Monnier 2008, Zhou 2007). In vitro functional studies support that this variant results in increased sensitivity to RYR1-agonists (Merrit 2017, Parker 2017, Ducreux 2006). It has been identified in 5/282784 of the total chromosomes in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest an impact to the protein. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for both autosomal dominant malignant hyperthermia and autosomal recessive congenital myopathy / central core disease. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong, PM2, PP3, PS3_Supporting. - |
methoxyflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
enflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
halothane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
desflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
succinylcholine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
sevoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
isoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at