rs11952056
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 4P and 9B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_198253.3(TERT):āc.572G>Cā(p.Ser191Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000195 in 1,591,576 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S191G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198253.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERT | NM_198253.3 | c.572G>C | p.Ser191Thr | missense_variant | 2/16 | ENST00000310581.10 | |
TERT | NM_001193376.3 | c.572G>C | p.Ser191Thr | missense_variant | 2/15 | ||
TERT | NR_149162.3 | n.651G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 | |||
TERT | NR_149163.3 | n.651G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERT | ENST00000310581.10 | c.572G>C | p.Ser191Thr | missense_variant | 2/16 | 1 | NM_198253.3 | P2 | |
TERT | ENST00000334602.10 | c.572G>C | p.Ser191Thr | missense_variant | 2/15 | 1 | A2 | ||
TERT | ENST00000460137.6 | c.572G>C | p.Ser191Thr | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/13 | 1 | |||
TERT | ENST00000656021.1 | c.572G>C | p.Ser191Thr | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/17 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000913 AC: 139AN: 152254Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000226 AC: 46AN: 203766Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 23AN XY: 113938
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000116 AC: 167AN: 1439206Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000102 AC XY: 73AN XY: 715782
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000945 AC: 144AN: 152370Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00106 AC XY: 79AN XY: 74508
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 23, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 25, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Oct 11, 2022 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 29, 2020 | - - |
Aplastic anemia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
TERT-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 17, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at