rs11955288
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):āc.5823T>Cā(p.His1941His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0999 in 1,607,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,435 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.094 ( 769 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.10 ( 7666 hom. )
Consequence
FBN2
NM_001999.4 synonymous
NM_001999.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.30
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 5-128303067-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128303067-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129044.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128303067-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.3 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0999 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.5823T>C | p.His1941His | synonymous_variant | 46/65 | 1 | NM_001999.4 | ENSP00000262464.4 | ||
FBN2 | ENST00000703783.1 | n.2607T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 21/38 | ||||||
FBN2 | ENST00000703785.1 | n.2526T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 20/27 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0946 AC: 14377AN: 152054Hom.: 768 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
14377
AN:
152054
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0937 AC: 23553AN: 251308Hom.: 1136 AF XY: 0.0944 AC XY: 12823AN XY: 135830
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
23553
AN:
251308
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
12823
AN XY:
135830
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.100 AC: 146194AN: 1455582Hom.: 7666 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.101 AC XY: 73124AN XY: 724560
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
146194
AN:
1455582
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
73124
AN XY:
724560
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0945 AC: 14378AN: 152172Hom.: 769 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0918 AC XY: 6827AN XY: 74400
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
14378
AN:
152172
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6827
AN XY:
74400
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
261
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 04, 2013 | His1941His in exon 46 of FBN2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 10.6% (466/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs11955288). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 05, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 22, 2017 | Variant summary: The FBN2 c.5823T>C (p.His1941His) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE sites at the locus. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in the large control database ExAC at a frequency of 0.0948795 (11503/121238 control chromosomes [584 homozygotes]), which is approximately 75904 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FBN2 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. To our knowledge, the variant of interest has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at