rs121907944
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.710C>A(p.Ala237Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,612,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000152.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 250946Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135794
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460806Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726724
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74306
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: GAA c.710C>A (p.Ala237Glu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the N-terminal barrel domain (IPR031727) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 250946 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.710C>A in individuals affected with Glycogen Storage Disease, Type 2 (Pompe Disease) and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at