rs1278834014
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_003000.3(SDHB):c.642G>T(p.Gln214His) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely pathogenic in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q214R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003000.3 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHB | NM_003000.3 | c.642G>T | p.Gln214His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 6 of 8 | ENST00000375499.8 | NP_002991.2 | |
SDHB | NM_001407361.1 | c.588G>T | p.Gln196His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 6 of 8 | NP_001394290.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHB | ENST00000375499.8 | c.642G>T | p.Gln214His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 6 of 8 | 1 | NM_003000.3 | ENSP00000364649.3 | ||
SDHB | ENST00000491274.6 | c.600G>T | p.Gln200His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 6 of 8 | 5 | ENSP00000480482.2 | |||
SDHB | ENST00000463045.3 | c.471G>T | p.Gln157His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 6 of 8 | 3 | ENSP00000481376.2 | |||
SDHB | ENST00000485515.5 | n.576G>T | splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 6 of 7 | 5 | ENSP00000519322.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Located at the last nucleotide of the exon in a gene for which loss-of-function is a known mechanism of disease, and both splice predictors and evolutionary conservation support a deleterious effect, although the actual effect of this sequence change on splicing is unknown in the absence of functional studies; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The p.Q214H variant (also known as c.642G>T), located in coding exon 6 of the SDHB gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 642. The amino acid change results in glutamine to histidine at codon 214, an amino acid with highly similar properties. However, this change occurs in the last base pair of coding exon 6, which makes it likely to have some effect on normal mRNA splicing. This variant was detected in an individual with a paraganglioma in our laboratory (Ambry internal data). In addition, a different alteration at the same nucleotide position (c.642G>C) was reported in an individual with a malignant paraganglioma (Brouwers FM et al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 2006 Nov;91:4505-9; Jochmanova I et al. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 2017 Aug;143:1421-1435). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. Using the BDGP and ESEfinder splice site prediction tools, this alteration is predicted to weaken the efficiency of the native splice donor site; however, direct evidence is unavailable. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at