rs13079478
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024513.4(FYCO1):c.3003C>A(p.Asn1001Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.113 in 1,613,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,741 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1001D) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024513.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0885 AC: 13468AN: 152166Hom.: 972 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.124 AC: 31070AN: 249724Hom.: 3025 AF XY: 0.139 AC XY: 18806AN XY: 135120
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.115 AC: 168149AN: 1461676Hom.: 12770 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.123 AC XY: 89680AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0884 AC: 13461AN: 152284Hom.: 971 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0944 AC XY: 7029AN XY: 74464
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 18 Benign:3
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at