rs13201004

Variant names:

• chr6-100388908-C-A
• rs13201004
• NM_005068.3:c.*1453G>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr6-100388908-C-A
• chr6-100388908-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6_Moderate BA1

The NM_005068.3(SIM1):​c.*1453G>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.116 in 152,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,047 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 (1047 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 (0 hom.)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: SIM1 NM_005068.3 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.09

Genes affected

SIM1 (HGNC:10882): (SIM bHLH transcription factor 1) SIM1 and SIM2 genes are Drosophila single-minded (sim) gene homologs. SIM1 transcript was detected only in fetal kidney out of various adult and fetal tissues tested. Since the sim gene plays an important role in Drosophila development and has peak levels of expression during the period of neurogenesis,it was proposed that the human SIM gene is a candidate for involvement in certain dysmorphic features (particularly the facial and skull characteristics), abnormalities of brain development, and/or cognitive disability of Down syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
• BP6: Variant 6-100388908-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-100388908-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 354661.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.143 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SIM1	NM_005068.3	c.*1453G>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 12 of 12	ENST00000369208.8	NP_005059.2
SIM1	NM_001374769.1	c.*1453G>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 12 of 12		NP_001361698.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SIM1	ENST00000369208	c.*1453G>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 12 of 12	1	NM_005068.3	ENSP00000358210.4
SIM1	ENST00000262901	c.*1453G>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 11 of 11	1		ENSP00000262901.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.116 AC: 17690 AN: 152018 Hom.: 1035 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0944

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.0603

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.135

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.130

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.152

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.0713

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0875

Gnomad MID AF: 0.177

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.130

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.124

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 2

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.116 AC: 17709 AN: 152136 Hom.: 1047 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.114 AC XY: 8478 AN XY: 74374

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0942

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.135

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.130

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.152

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.0705

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0875

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.130

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.134

Alfa AF: 0.127 Hom.: 1142

Bravo AF: 0.119

Asia WGS AF: 0.139 AC: 483 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Obesity due to SIM1 deficiency Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.68
CADD	Benign	7.7
DANN	Benign	0.70

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13201004; hg19: chr6-100836784;