rs132630309

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001399.5(EDA):c.206G>T(p.Arg69Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00485 in 1,210,205 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. There are 1,824 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 1 hom., 89 hem., cov: 24)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0050 ( 16 hom. 1735 hem. )

Consequence

EDA
NM_001399.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:2U:2B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.86

Variant links:

Genes affected

EDA (HGNC:3157): (ectodysplasin A) The protein encoded by this gene is a type II membrane protein that can be cleaved by furin to produce a secreted form. The encoded protein, which belongs to the tumor necrosis factor family, acts as a homotrimer and may be involved in cell-cell signaling during the development of ectodermal organs. Defects in this gene are a cause of ectodermal dysplasia, anhidrotic, which is also known as X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Several transcript variants encoding many different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

EDA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.023254514).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00301 (338/112334) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00538 (285/53015). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00486. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 89 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 24. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 89 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EDA	NM_001399.5 link	c.206G>T	p.Arg69Leu	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 8	ENST00000374552.9	NP_001390.1	Q92838-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EDA	ENST00000374552.9 link	c.206G>T	p.Arg69Leu	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 8	1	NM_001399.5	ENSP00000363680.4		Q92838-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00302

AC:

339

AN:

112284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00258

AC XY:

AN XY:

34438

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000581

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00185

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000285

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000320

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00537

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00264

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00286

AC:

519

AN:

181348

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00302

AC XY:

201

AN XY:

66662

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000997

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000841

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00136

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000694

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00517

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00267

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00504

AC:

5529

AN:

1097871

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00477

AC XY:

1735

AN XY:

363367

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000852

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00279

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000892

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00607

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00369

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00301

AC:

338

AN:

112334

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00258

AC XY:

AN XY:

34500

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000580

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000286

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000320

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00538

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00261

Alfa

AF:

0.00376

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00296

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00324

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00450

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00130

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00550

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00321

AC:

390

EpiCase

AF:

0.00502

EpiControl

AF:

0.00439

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

EDA: PP3, BS2 -

Jan 05, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 15, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 8696334, 24631698, 26600092) -

Hypohidrotic X-linked ectodermal dysplasia

Pathogenic:2Uncertain:2Benign:2

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 1996

OMIM

Significance: Pathogenic

Review Status: flagged submission

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Jan 17, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 03, 2017

Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Significance: Pathogenic

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Feb 17, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: EDA c.206G>T (p.Arg69Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0029 in 181348 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 201 hemizygotes and 1 homozygote. The high occurrence of hemizygotes suggests that the variant is benign. Although the variant, c.206G>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia or related phenotypes (e.g. Kere_1996, Vincent_2001, Stagi_2009, Schneider_2011, Dietz_2013, Bonds_2014, Burger_2014, Ferstl_2018), however, no evidence for cosegregation was reported. In addition, in some of these cases co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported, which could explain the phenotype (EDA c.991C>T (p.Gln331Ter), Dietz_2013; EDA c.467G>A (p.Arg156His), Stagi_2009; TP63 c.952C>T (p.Arg318Cys), Ferstl_2018), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with conflicting assessments, including pathogenic (n=1), uncertain significance (n=2), and benign (n=4) / likely benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Apr 03, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Arg69Leu in exon 1 of EDA: This variant has been reported in 5 probands with X LHED, one of whom also carried a pathogenic variant in the same gene (Kere1996, Vincent 2001, Schneider 2011, Dietz 2013). However, this variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.5% (231/47072 ) of European chromosomes (94 hemizygotes) by the Exome Aggregation Consortium ( ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs132630309). -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

EDA-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.28

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.045

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.29

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.54

.;.;.;.;D;.

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.82

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.81

MetaRNN

Benign

0.023

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Pathogenic

0.82

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.81

L;L;L;L;L;L

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.84

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.3

D;D;D;N;N;N

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.72

Sift

Benign

0.084

T;T;T;D;.;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;B;P;P;P

Vest4

0.16

MVP

1.0

MPC

0.97

ClinPred

0.050

GERP RS

3.2

Varity_R

0.54

gMVP

0.71

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over