rs137852883
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 6P and 1B. PM1PM2PM5BP4
The NM_018941.4(CLN8):c.88G>A(p.Ala30Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A30P) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018941.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN8 | NM_018941.4 | c.88G>A | p.Ala30Thr | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000331222.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN8 | ENST00000331222.6 | c.88G>A | p.Ala30Thr | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_018941.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251462Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 13, 2017 | A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the CLN8 gene. The A30T variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. A different missense variant at the same position (A30P) has been reported previously in the homozygous state in an individual with variant late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (Cannelli et al., 2006). The A30T variant is not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). The A30T variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. Based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The CLN8 p.Ala30Thr variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs137852883) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by GeneDx). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 251462 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000003977 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the Latino population in 1 of 34590 chromosomes (freq: 0.000029), but was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Other, or South Asian populations. The p.Ala30 residue is conserved in mammals however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at