rs137853860

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 15 ACMG points: 15P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong

The NM_001008216.2(GALE):c.715C>T(p.Arg239Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000869 in 1,610,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000082 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GALE
NM_001008216.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.74

Publications

10 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GALE (HGNC:4116): (UDP-galactose-4-epimerase) This gene encodes UDP-galactose-4-epimerase which catalyzes two distinct but analogous reactions: the epimerization of UDP-glucose to UDP-galactose, and the epimerization of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine to UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine. The bifunctional nature of the enzyme has the important metabolic consequence that mutant cells (or individuals) are dependent not only on exogenous galactose, but also on exogenous N-acetylgalactosamine as a necessary precursor for the synthesis of glycoproteins and glycolipids. Mutations in this gene result in epimerase-deficiency galactosemia, also referred to as galactosemia type 3, a disease characterized by liver damage, early-onset cataracts, deafness and cognitive disability, with symptoms ranging from mild ('peripheral' form) to severe ('generalized' form). Multiple alternatively spliced transcripts encoding the same protein have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

GALE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

galactose epimerase deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P, Ambry Genetics

GALE links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 15 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PP2

Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 9 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 1 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: -0.32246 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 0.87424 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to galactose epimerase deficiency.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.986

PP5

Variant 1-23796777-G-A is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr1-23796777-G-A is described in ClinVar as Pathogenic/Likely_pathogenic. ClinVar VariationId is 21172.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
GALE	NM_001008216.2 link	c.715C>T	p.Arg239Trp	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 12	ENST00000617979.5	NP_001008217.1
GALE	NM_000403.4 link	c.715C>T	p.Arg239Trp	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 12		NP_000394.2
GALE	NM_001127621.2 link	c.715C>T	p.Arg239Trp	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 11		NP_001121093.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GALE	ENST00000617979.5 link	c.715C>T	p.Arg239Trp	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 12	1	NM_001008216.2	ENSP00000483375.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000164

AC:

AN:

243976

AF XY:

0.0000228

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000649

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000296

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000550

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000908

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000823

AC:

AN:

1458070

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000124

AC XY:

AN XY:

724898

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000598

AC:

AN:

33424

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000226

AC:

AN:

44196

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25966

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000101

AC:

AN:

39654

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85542

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53208

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000450

AC:

AN:

1110044

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60272

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41544

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.575

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

UDPglucose-4-epimerase deficiency

Pathogenic:2Other:1

GeneReviews

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:literature only

Account for 67% of alleles reported in a cohort of asymptomatic Koreans with peripheral epimerase deficiency galactosemia -

Mar 18, 2016

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center

Significance:Likely pathogenic

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:reference population

- -

May 05, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Pathogenic

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: GALE c.715C>T (p.Arg239Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the NAD(P)-binding domain (IPR016040) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. This is supported by molecular dynamics, residue network analysis, and cross-correlation matrix based computational strategies (Kumar_2019) supporting a critical amino acid residue essential for UDP-galactose 4-epimerase enzyme function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 243976 control chromosomes. c.715C>T has been reported in the literature as a biallelic genotype in individuals affected with UDPglucose-4-Epimerase Deficiency (example Park_2005). At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Bang_2009). The most pronounced variant effect results in no detectable enzyme activity when expressed in GALE-null ldlD cells. Also unlike wild-type, this variant was not able to rescue galactose-sensitive cell proliferation when stably expressed in ldlD cells. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19250319, 33555556, 16301867, 30247636). One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. -

UDPglucose-4-epimerase deficiency;C5935599:Thrombocytopenia 13, syndromic

Pathogenic:1

Feb 28, 2024

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Pathogenic

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.84

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.53

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.52

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.92

D;D;D;T;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.86

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.71

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

1.0

D;.;D;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.47

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.99

D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Pathogenic

1.0

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

5.2

H;H;.;.;.

PhyloP100

1.7

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.86

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-7.9

.;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.92

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

.;D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;.;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;.;.;D

Vest4

0.98

MutPred

0.97

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0283);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0283);.;.;.;

MVP

0.99

MPC

0.63

ClinPred

1.0

GERP RS

4.7

PromoterAI

0.062

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.98

gMVP

0.93

Mutation Taster

=11/89

disease causing (ClinVar)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

Splicevardb

2.0

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over